uid

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place. Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.” -A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty” and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” - Edward Snowden

Special

Here is what the Parliament Standing Committee on Finance, which examined the draft N I A Bill said.

1. There is no feasibility study of the project]

2. The project was approved in haste

3. The system has far-reaching consequences for national security

4. The project is directionless with no clarity of purpose

5. It is built on unreliable and untested technology

6. The exercise becomes futile in case the project does not continue beyond the present number of 200 million enrolments

7. There is lack of coordination and difference of views between various departments and ministries of government on the project

Quotes

What was said before the elections:

NPR & UID aiding Aliens – Narendra Modi

"I don't agree to Nandan Nilekeni and his madcap (UID) scheme which he is trying to promote," Senior BJP Leader Yashwant Sinha, Sept 2012

"All we have to show for the hundreds of thousands of crore spent on Aadhar is a Congress ticket for Nilekani" Yashwant Sinha.(27/02/2014)

TV Mohandas Pai, former chief financial officer and head of human resources, tweeted: "selling his soul for power; made his money in the company wedded to meritocracy." Money Life Article

Nilekani’s reporting structure is unprecedented in history; he reports directly to the Prime Minister, thus bypassing all checks and balances in government - Home Minister Chidambaram

To refer to Aadhaar as an anti corruption tool despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary is mystifying. That it is now officially a Rs.50,000 Crores solution searching for an explanation is also without any doubt. -- Statement by Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP & Member, Standing Committee on Finance

Finance minister P Chidambaram’s statement, in an exit interview to this newspaper, that Aadhaar needs to be re-thought completely is probably the last nail in its coffin. :-) Financial Express

The Rural Development Ministry headed by Jairam Ramesh created a road Block and refused to make Aadhaar mandatory for making wage payment to people enrolled under the world’s largest social security scheme NRGA unless all residents are covered.


Friday, September 25, 2015

8747 - Udyog Aadhaar Memorandum may be gazetted this week: MSME secretary, Dr Anup K Pujari Capital Market - Business Standard

Capital Market 
September 25, 2015 Last Updated at 11:04 IST

Govt. planning to increase investment ceiling for village industries

The one-page Udyog Aadhaar Memorandum introduced by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) has been approved by the government, sent for publication and is likely to be gazetted this week, MSME secretary, Dr Anup K Pujari said at an ASSOCHAM event.

We are planning to increase the financial limit on investment of a micro, small and medium entrepreneur for the village industries because I implement the KVIC (Khadi and Village Industries Commission) Act, said Mr Pujari while inaugurating the Day-2 of the Global Investors' India Forum organised by The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM).

We are trying to link it to some prior number an enterprise would have got, said Dr Pujari.

We are also trying to encourage the entities, if you have got the Tax Identification Number (TIN) or PAN (Permanent Account Number) on the income tax please mention it on that, he added.
It will take a little time to let all stakeholders come on board, we have had discussions with all the state governments and all industry associations and have incorporated their suggestions, further said Dr Pujari.

Sharing his personal view on registration for entrepreneurs, the secretary said, My private view is that registration should not be there, it is just not necessary.

He also said that the MSME Development Act, 2006 which is being amended and has been placed before the Parliament and is unanimously recommended by the Standing Committee may be passed in the next session.

It will at least signal that whatever limits were fixed in 2006 were allied to the inflation and increase in the prices of machinery and therefore, the same limit need not continue and we must remove that limit and we must increase the limit, said Dr Pujari.

He also said that in the present scenario power is not a limiting factor for growth and development of MSMEs in the country. Besides, he emphasised that all banking and financial institutions have a significant role in the development of MSME sector in India.

He also said that in every procurement the vendor who succeeds has to have a small business development programme, whether it be called the vendor development or small business development, they have to have that programme as it will be part of the technical evaluation by the government.
While doing the technical evaluation we will not only look into the quality of the product that is being given, not only look into the technical parameters, but how you are going to develop your vendor, how you are going to pass on some amount of work so that there is ancillary activity that would come up, would also be considered, said Dr Pujari.

Further, the secretary stressed upon the need for the government and private sector to work together. We have to work together, nothing will get done only by government making the law, I think we are an over-regulated society and you should help us in not making more laws and regulations, we should work together and if in this there are difficulties we will consider.