uid

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place. Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.” -A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty” and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” - Edward Snowden

Special

Here is what the Parliament Standing Committee on Finance, which examined the draft N I A Bill said.

1. There is no feasibility study of the project]

2. The project was approved in haste

3. The system has far-reaching consequences for national security

4. The project is directionless with no clarity of purpose

5. It is built on unreliable and untested technology

6. The exercise becomes futile in case the project does not continue beyond the present number of 200 million enrolments

7. There is lack of coordination and difference of views between various departments and ministries of government on the project

Quotes

What was said before the elections:

NPR & UID aiding Aliens – Narendra Modi

"I don't agree to Nandan Nilekeni and his madcap (UID) scheme which he is trying to promote," Senior BJP Leader Yashwant Sinha, Sept 2012

"All we have to show for the hundreds of thousands of crore spent on Aadhar is a Congress ticket for Nilekani" Yashwant Sinha.(27/02/2014)

TV Mohandas Pai, former chief financial officer and head of human resources, tweeted: "selling his soul for power; made his money in the company wedded to meritocracy." Money Life Article

Nilekani’s reporting structure is unprecedented in history; he reports directly to the Prime Minister, thus bypassing all checks and balances in government - Home Minister Chidambaram

To refer to Aadhaar as an anti corruption tool despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary is mystifying. That it is now officially a Rs.50,000 Crores solution searching for an explanation is also without any doubt. -- Statement by Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP & Member, Standing Committee on Finance

Finance minister P Chidambaram’s statement, in an exit interview to this newspaper, that Aadhaar needs to be re-thought completely is probably the last nail in its coffin. :-) Financial Express

The Rural Development Ministry headed by Jairam Ramesh created a road Block and refused to make Aadhaar mandatory for making wage payment to people enrolled under the world’s largest social security scheme NRGA unless all residents are covered.


Monday, March 7, 2016

9407 - Beneficial Aadhaar needs legal backing - Deccan Herald

February 29, 2016, Bengaluru, DHNS

India has achieved unique distinction of connecting almost one billion people through Aadhaar cards, the world’s largest biometric programme that has a great potential to transform lives of hundreds of millions of people, especially those who are economically vulnerable and deserve hand-holding by the state. While the entire programme was conceived and half-way implemented by the then UPA government, the Nandan Nilekani-headed initiative has been equally supported by the Narendra Modi government thanks mainly to its pro-people appeal. The digital ID not only gives every citizen a sense of identity but also provides a seamless apparatus to the government to reach out to the last man or woman in the economic or social paradigm. In fact, it has shown a glide-path to institutions like the World Bank on how to reach the benefits to the poor without being pilfered on the way. Commending the programme, a recent World Bank report on Digital Dividends has estimated that it has resulted in saving a billion dollar to the Indian government by plugging leakage of subsidies which are increasingly being routed through the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) system.

While Aadhaar cards would not allow the middlemen to pocket thousands of crores of rupees meant for the poor and the lower middle class through the DBT, the biometric data base and its linkages with the banks through other ambitious programmes like the Jan Dhan Yojna would add up to a world of information about each of the beneficiaries. For instance, the banks servicing them can track their financial behaviour and accordingly devise the need-based micro-finance products for needs such as sewing machine, cycle or auto rickshaw. With increasing penetration of Internet through affordable smartphones, those at the bottom of the pyramid will grow well beyond beneficiaries of the government schemes to resourceful and empowered customers for a host of businesses. This would be the best case of disruptive technology and business model, so to speak.


Since the entire Aadhaar card programme is being implemented through an executive authority, it has been challenged in the Supreme Court on the issue of privacy. While the kind of information sought by the biometric system cannot be kept confidential anyway given the fact that electronic way of life is becoming all-pervasive, the best course should be to give it a legislative shield by an Act of Parliament. The government must show a sense of urgency in pushing the required legislation in Parliament in the Budget session itself. The Aadhaar Bill should generally be supported by all the parties, including the Congress which can claim its share of the credit as well for seeding the programme in the first place.