Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

10549 - Enormity of Aadhaar does not add to its vulnerability: Symantec - Financial Express

With over a billion Aadhaar IDs allotted to Indian citizens, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is the largest national identification number project in the world.

By: Nandagopal Rajan | Published: October 20, 2016 6:03 AM

Ilias Chantzos, senior director—government affairs, EMEA-APJ at Symantec, however, says the enormity of this data set has not added to the vulnerability in any way.

With over a billion Aadhaar IDs allotted to Indian citizens, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is the largest national identification number project in the world. For the same reason, this centralised data base is also one that needs to be secure all the time.

Ilias Chantzos, senior director—government affairs, EMEA-APJ at Symantec, however, says the enormity of this data set has not added to the vulnerability in any way. “In the end it is all about finding the right balance and making sure you have the right protections in place while offering the flexibility and advantages of digital usage,” he says. “We have to accept that identity is going more and more online, as you see with banks, and it is a natural evolution. So don’t view this as an additional vulnerability.”

Any standard for protecting public data, he says, needs to take into consideration local context as well. “There is a school of thought that argues the need for a sector specific standard for finance or health. This is the American way. But the European way is horizontal, to have a more encompassing standard irrespective of a sector or area of business. And these two models do seem to compete,” says Chantzos. He represents Symantec before government bodies, national authorities and international organisations advising on public policy issues, with particular regard to IT security and data risk management and availability.

“Depending on the trade flows and data flows, countries such as India will be pulled into these two directions. In the end, every country is going to have something that fits its idiosyncrasies, but it would have to be somehow compatible to do business with other major trading partners,” he adds. According to him, the right approach will be to put emphasis on individual data protection, because “that is where the value is”.

But governments often add more context to individual data, without permission from them. This is again a call that has to be taken at a local level, he says. “There needs to be information self-determination, but even that is subject to certain restrictions. In the end you have to manage the identity and the use case will determine how you do it. But in such a case we will need to look at even the potential use cases of Aadhaar,” he says, underlining that when GSM standards were set up, no one had thought that mobile phones would be used for banking.
Chantzos says there is growing realisation that since we are all connected these days, the impact of a cyber incident will be much more. “There is greater realisation that there is value in the data and data economy, which is why you see more attacks on the infrastructure that supports it,” he says, adding that in that sense India is no different from the rest of the world. “On one hand you see a lot of effort from the government in the UID project, but at the same time there is the challenge to share this information.”