The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, December 23, 2016

10583 - Scrapping of Rs500, Rs1,000 notes a boost for cashless economy: Nandan Nilekani - Live Mint

Last Modified: Thu, Nov 10 2016. 10 04 AM IST

Nandan Nilekani, one of the brains behind the Unified Payments Interface, on the near-term challenges of going cashless

Photo: Hemant Mishra/Mint

While the government’s decision to scrap Rs500 and Rs1,000 bank notes has been met with resistance from some quarters and been called too abrupt, Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani backed it, saying it was needed to speed up the move to a cashless economy. “There is no question that this is a very bold move—and it’s a defining point in India moving to cashless,” Nilekani said over the phone on Wednesday.

One of the foremost advocates of a cashless economy, former Unique Identification Authority of India chairman Nilekani argued that India is better equipped to handle this transition than other nations and has the necessary infrastructure to enable digital payments to gather pace. Nilekani, one of the brains behind the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), spoke in an interview about the near-term challenges of going cashless and how it needs to be tackled. Edited excerpts:
The reaction to scrapping the bank notes has drawn criticism in some quarters and been called too abrupt. What do you make of this transition?
For the move towards a cashless economy, this is a huge boost. The launch of UPI is (timed) just right and I’m sure they must have looked at the fact that UPI is coming. This will accelerate the cashless movement—people using phones to do P2P (peer-to-peer) payments using UPI or making merchant payments, all that will receive a tremendous boost. The other thing is that people will need to figure things out over the next few weeks because the dislocation that will happen when people will not have their notes and the retailer will not accept notes, they will realize that cash was thought of as such a friction-free thing. Now, they will suddenly find that it’s a nuisance. I think this will push people towards digital transactions. All in all, it’s a great signal for taking India cashless and I think the infrastructure that we have built over the last seven years—Aadhaar, IndiaStack and UPI in particular—will get a tremendous boost.
Close to 50% of India is still unbanked. Do you think the digital revolution is happening quickly enough?
I think the bank account movement is happening. Just on Jan Dhan Yojna, they opened 240 million bank accounts and if you look at the Aadhaar Payment Bridge, they have 350 million bank accounts linked to Aadhaar numbers, which means 350 million unique people who are basically adults and have a bank account, have their Aadhaar numbers linked. And now with the payments banks coming, more and more accounts will be opened—already people are getting wallets. So, I think it will just accelerate.
What are some of the things that need to happen to lead to more rapid adoption of digital transactions?
I think the cashless revolution is happening for three reasons—on the government side, there is the desire to make India cashless to eliminate black money, have a digital trail of transactions and so on. A lot of this is related to that part. And then from the consumer side, I think there is the desire to make payments, buy things online quickly, etc. So, from the people side, there is a desire to go cashless.
And now, with the infrastructure that we have created, we have the technology—so demand is there, the government push is there and the technology is there. So, all the things put together should lead to rapid adoption... I think the experience of cash management that everybody is going to encounter in the next few weeks, that will make them realize the power of a digital approach.
The Jan Dhan Yojana was about opening bank accounts. Aadhaar was about giving them the identity. Then Aadhaar-linked bank accounts became the basis for DBT (Direct Benefit Transfer). Today India has done more than a billion transactions on the DBT platform using Aadhaar. So, already people are getting their pensions and scholarships in their bank accounts, so everyone is getting a bank account. Then IMPS plays a huge role in the migrant movement and sending money and so on. Of course, the icing on the cake is UPI which is dramatically going to change the P2P transactions as well as merchant payments. And I think the real power of UPI is not just online merchants -- that’s only a small part of the business. Most merchant transactions are offline -- once offline merchants start using UPI, then you really see it taking off.
Customers want digital because it’s convenient to them -- government wants digital because they want to bring a transparency and technology platform, we have the world’s best infrastructure for digital payments. So, everything is coming together….We already saw IMPS (immediate payment service) go from zero to 29,000 crores a month in five years. So, there’s no reason why the UPI and its adoption won’t go there too.
What are some of the near-term challenges of moving towards a cashless economy?
Clearly, everything needs to stabilize. Then, you need people with a feature phone to participate in some way. They may not be able to get the full range of features, but they must be able to at least make or receive payments using UPI. And then connectivity, and companies will have to stick it to the offline retail outlets -- so, all this will be required over the next 6-12 months.
While UPI is a cornerstone of the fin-tech revolution in India, it has also faced criticism from some quarters -- for instance, the likes of Amazon have argued that UPI is too closely controlled and regulated by the banks and should be more inclusive, especially with merchants. How does that need to be addressed?
Everybody has to follow the rules—India has a Payment and Settlement Act, which is the basis for payments and within that Act, the RBI permits different people to participate in the payments system, and those could be regulated entities such as banks or whatever. That’s the rule, that’s the system -- you can’t do whatever you want. Payment is a very important thing, it’s part of the financial infrastructure of the country and the way it’s designed now is perfectly alright.
Somebody who wants to access payments, can do that through the banks. And the banks are tying up with others—for instance, Yes Bank has tied up with PhonePe, Axis Bank has tied up with FreeCharge and so on. Those kinds of tie-ups will bring about innovation and the robustness of the financial system is also there. You saw what happened with the global financial crisis in the US—it was excessive innovation, without proper regulation. And that led to the whole global economy collapsing. We have to do this carefully and I think the RBI has done an excellent job in calibrating innovation.