In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, November 6, 2017

12306 - Janta Ka Conclave



At Janta Ka Conclave, CPI-M’s Rajya Sabha MP Md Salim, Congress MP Sushmita Dev and Chandrima Bhattacharya, minister in Mamata Banerjee government discuss the role of lawmakers in delivering social justice in India

Md Salim, CPI-M MP
Making Aadhaar compulsory is fundamentally opposed to our constitution. What happens to the data you are collecting for mobile companies? What happened in demonetisation? You were expected to submit the photo copy of your Aadhaar card. So all these black money holders, they employed several people, to use those photo copies of Aadhaar to deposit money because the banks had earlier said that people could use photo copies to deposit certain amount of money. That’s why demonetisation became a scam in itself. Okay, every body is not Jay Shah, but many people made tons of money during demonetisation. On Aadhaar, this government is converting the rights into entitlement. You are creating a society that are divided between ‘have lots’ and ‘have not.’

Sushmita Dev, Congress MP
What’s important to understand about Gujarat elections is that the Gujarat Model was a fairytale of 2014, sold to rest of India outside Gujarat and people believed it. There are two aspects to it. Gujarat has always had the history of being seen as a more developed state than any other and more enterprising because it has a port and it’s a trade hub. But I think this Gujarat elections, I’ve just spent seven days there doing work for my organisation. And I can tell you that when you ask people of Gujarat ‘vikaas ko kya hua hai?‘ they say ‘vikaas paagal ho gaya hai.’ I don’t know what will happen in the elections, but it’s something worth seeing and one has to recall how Prime Minister Modi, that time he was the prime minister in waiting, sold that story. How can the same people within three years of becoming the prime minister with a historical mandate in Gujarat say ‘vikaas paagal ho gaya hai.’ In between they tried to change the slogan to pragati (Hindi for growth), so then the slogan started that pragati bhaag gayi.

Purnima Bhattacharya, Minister of State (Health, E-governance), Bengal govt
All laws in the constitution aim at rendering and delivering social justice. But the question whether this social justice is reaching and achieving its goal for which the laws are framed. It is for the lawmakers to also see that whatever laws are being made to render social justice, they are actually being implemented. It’s equally true not only the affirmative laws but there should also be action. As Md Salim said, if the government wants they can always pass the bills in the parliament. It’s all about our intention. Our chief minister, Mamata Banerjee, the first thing she did was to pass the 50% reservation for women at the Panchayat level. If your intention is right, you can always overcome disruptions.




Swati Maliwal:
“When I was appointed the DCW chairperson, I was the advisor to the chief minister on grievances. I wondered why I was being asked to head a body, where only retired people were appointed in the past. But I read the act. Women commissions be it Delhi Women Commission, Bengal Women Commission or the National Commission for Women, they all are formed under an act, which is very powerful. I can summon police commissioner and any other officer. If I want, I can make recommendations to the government on any issue. And, if on occasions our instructions are ignored, I can also issue arrest warrant.”
“I will give you an example. We asked for data from Delhi Police Commissioner because, unfortunately, Delhi is known as the rape capital of the world. We asked for data on how many cases in crimes against women were registered, how many chargesheets were filed and what was the number of convictions. Interestingly, for the six months, we were denied the data. After that we issued a notice to the police commissioner and he was very angry. He said that there will a law and order issue if they gave the data to us. We then issued a summon against him warning that if he did not give us the data we will have to issue an arrest warrant. Then all data arrived and the finding was shocking. The data was that between 2012 and 2014, 31,446 crimes were registered in Delhi. FIRs were filed but less than 150 were convicted. In our country nobody fears the law. They think they can get away with any crimes and women and that’s what the DCW is trying to change.”

Gurmehar Kaur:
The most important thing that I realised that I needed to break the media cycle. I realised that they were going to make the story out of anything. I just had to stop giving them something. I was so nervous, I was so scared. But over the period of time, I realised it was was ok to be nervous. I was shivering. I couldn’t get out of my bed. That night I hadn’t slept. I remember when I got back, the first call I got was from Swati( Maliwal) mam. That was the first time I felt it was going to be ok… Just because of her I felt safe in Delhi. Just because of her I was able to come back. They confidence her team gave me, my mother, my aunt. I think it’s so important when you are talking about social justice for women that only authorities can do that. There is the safety that people holding important positions can provide to you. I could be the bravest person but I need somebody that you are going to be okay.”

Sharmistha Mukherjee:
“Delhi used to be very safe during our childhood. But in last 20 years, Delhi’s condition has deteriorated alarmingly. One of the reasons is that people now have quick money because of the real estate development. Our real challenge is how to channelise the youth energy. If we can’t channelise the energy of youth properly, they can turn destructive. So it (growing number of rapes) is not just a political problem. It’s a social problem.
“In Bengal things are slightly different. Here we worship mothers. Durga Puja is an integral part of our culture here. Women in the whole of eastern and north-east India are given better respect than say in north India.”

Mamata Banerjee will do what it takes to remove the BJP: Derek O’Brien



Trinamool Congress’s parliamentary party leader, Derek O’Brien, has said that the West Bengal chief minister, Mamata Banerjee, will do what ‘it takes to remove the BJP’ from the Centre.

Speaking exclusively at the Janta Ka Conclave, O’Brien said, “Kursi mein kucch nahi rakha hai. But she (Mamata) will do what it takes to remove the BJP. “  

Stressing on the need for a united opposition, O’Brien said that the Bengal chief minister had the ‘gravitas’ to bring together opposition parties with different ideologies on a single platform.
He said, “You need somebody with the gravitas to pull this off. How do you get the SP and the BSP to work together? If Mamata Banerjee reaches out to the SP and the BSP to work together, she has a far better chance of getting the SP and the BSP to work together. If I try and become a tennis coach and if Roger Federer tries to become a tennis coach, Roger Federer has that gravitas, he has that credibility in the tennis world. So I think Mamata di is now on top of her game.”


Rifat Jawaid breaks down while talking about his first break in journalism




For years you have seen Rifat Jawaid give grief to politicians while holding them to account. On 27 October, while speaking at Janta Ka Conclave in Kolkata, the editor-in-chief of Janta Ka Reporter, broke down in public. Rifat was introducing the segment to felicitate his mentor and the former editor of The Statesman, Michael Flannery, for his contribution to journalism. He recalled how Michael was the one who believed in Rifat’s ability as a journalist and gave him his first break. Rest, he added, was history.

Reacting to the public display of emotions, the conclave’s chief guest, Derek O’Brien, said that he was incredibly moved by the ‘guru-shishya’ tradition. Asking for a round of applause in honour of Rifat, the parliamentary party leader of the TMC said, “Today what I saw from you was so much of emotion and it’s so beautiful to see a grown-up man cry. And I am so happy that there are still some people like you in the world, whpo say thank you to their mentors…To me whatever questions you ask me today and whatever answer I give you, I will perhaps forget, but what you did to Mike by honouring him, that’s beautiful.”


Janta Ka Reporter will host its second edition of Janta Ka Conclave late in October in Kolkata. Themed around ‘social justice in India, the day-long conclave will have eminent guests from the world of politics, media, civil society, Bollywood and corporate.
————————————————————————————————
Here is itinerary for Janta Ka Conclave

Session 1 : 10-30-11.15
  1. Swati Maliwal, Chairperson, Delhi Commission for Women
  2. Chandrima Bhattacharya, Minister of State (Health, E-governance)
  3. Gurmehar Kaur, Student, Peace Activist
Session 2: 11.15-12.00
  1. Preeyam Budhia
  2. Meenu Budhia
  3. Arjun Chakrabarty
  4. Nilanjana Chakrabarty
Session 3 : 12.15- 13.00
  1. Shatarup Ghosh, CPI-M
  2. Ritesh Tiwari, BJP
  3. Rizwan Arshad, Congress MLC
  4. Ashoo Mongia, Gau Raksha Dal
  5. Lunch: 13.00- 14.00
Session 4 : 14.00-14.45 TBC
Session 5: 14.45-15.15
  1. Media Stalwarts: Michael Flannery, Aniruddha Bahl, Shikha Mukherjee, Rifat Jawaid
Session 6: 15.15- 15.45
  1. Sushmita Dev, Congress MP
  2. Md Salim, CPI-M MP
  3. Sukhendu Sekhar Roy, TMC MP
Session 7: 15-45- 16.15
  1. Local businesses
Session 8 16.30- 17.00

  1. Derek O’Brien, TMC parliamentary leader in Rajya Sabha