In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

12312 - Aadhaar: Eminent citizens seek transparency - UNi India

Posted at: Nov 6 2017 4:53PM


New Delhi, Nov 6 (UNI) A number of eminent jurists, citizens and rights activists on Monday wrote a letter to Justice Srikirishna seeking greater transparency in the Data Protection Committee set up by the Government to deliberate on a data protection framework for the country.

The authors of the letter, who include Justice AP Shah, civil servant Gopal Krishna Gandhi, rights activist Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey, Prof Upendra Baxi and former chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah among many others, have also questioned the composition of the committee, though expressing complete faith in its head Justice Srikishna.

They pointed out that most members on the current committee had in the past voiced or echoed views that seem to support Aadhaar, the brand created by the UIDAI, and some had even taken stands in the Supreme Court to challenge the fundamental right to privacy.

"A committee created to look at a fundamental issue which will impact this country needs to be balanced and cannot be biased towards one position, particularly when there might be conflicts of interest,’’ they said.

They demanded that the Data Protection committee should come from a varied background and urged inclusion of eminent citizens who have been consistent in advocating for peoples’ rights. 

Stating that critical aspect of the data protection framework is to define a complementary relationship between the right to information and the right to privacy, they recommend the inclusion of representatives of the Right to Information movement in the Committee.

They also underlined that the idea of consent must be central to the proposed data protection framework, adding that consent must be understood in the context of the interconnectedness of data to many aspects of democratic principles and rights. 

"There can be no argument that data protection is not merely about the protection of data but really about the protection of people,’’ the letter said.

Given the current scenario where ‘data is the new oil’, any understanding of the impact of policy will necessitate the inclusion of civil society members who have been examining the impact of such initiatives on democratic rights, the eminent citizens said.

''This includes matters of privacy, surveillance, aggregation of data, the commercial collection of data and its use and, more broadly, data used to restrict constitutional and other rights,’’ they said.

The authors also urged Justice Shrikrishna to ensure high transparency in the working of the committee. They suggested that notes all meetings should be made available to citizens, and deliberations of members shared publicly.

They also demanded that draft of the recommendation be put up for public consultation for wider input. "We hope you would consider this letter as part of the pre-legislative process in the creation of a data protection framework,’’ they said.

The activists and intellectuals, who have written the letter under the newly launched 'Rethink Aadhaar' initiative, also sought a meeting with the committee to discuss these issues.
This letter follows a letter by former civil servants to Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressing critical concerns on Aadhaar.

UNI NAZ SNU 1652

Read more at http://www.uniindia.com/aadhaar-eminent-citizens-seek-transparency/india/news/1038696.html#rMb4Ih8y4L3xDLjl.99