In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, December 7, 2017

12471 - Unable to Verify Fingerprints or Iris, Aadhaar Denies Leprosy Patients Basic Services - The Wire


It seems that UIDAI authorities overlooked making special arrangements or exceptions for people with disabilities. There is lack of clarity on how leprosy patients can register for their unique identity number. 

New Delhi: Sixty-five year old Sajida Begum, a leprosy patient at the Leprosy Hospital on Magadi Road in Bengaluru, has been struggling to make ends meet as she doesn’t have an Aadhaar card.
According to a report in the New Indian Express, Sajida, whose only income is the Rs 1,000 pension she gets every month, has received  a letter from the deputy tahsildar’s office in Rajajinagar informing that her pension would stop in seven days if she failed to link it with her Aadhaar card. Fingerprint and iris scan are mandatory for Aadhaar verification, but having lost her fingers and her eyesight to leprosy, Sajida doesn’t have those biometrics.

Dr Ayub Ali Zai, administrative medical officer at the 100-bed leprosy hospital said that out of the 57 patients, at least ten of them don’t have an Aadhaar card.
There is lack of clarity on how leprosy patients can register for their unique identity number.

Zai told the Express on Saturday that he wrote to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) officials asking them to exempt her from biometric verification considering her problem.
“She buys clothes and meets her meagre needs with that money. But since August, she hasn’t received pension. She is totally blind in both the eyes, has no fingers or toes. I don’t know how her biometric identification can be done. We don’t know if this is just an administrative delay in sending pension or if they have stopped it,” he said.

Another patient in the hospital has been making futile visits to the Aadhaar enrolment centre to get a card for him and his wife who is also a leprosy patient. He claims people at the Bangalore One centre sent him back saying that they cannot enrol her. When contacted by the Express, officials at the centre said if the patient came with a medical certificate affixing a photo showing their hands, something could be done.

When Express contacted UIDAI asking if exemptions could be made in biometrics for people with total disability, a top official requesting anonymity said, “Let them get enrolled first. Even if the woman doesn’t have sight, there may be biometrics that the machine can read. Only when the machine is unable to read and they get a rejection letter, it can be considered at the back end. There are cases where leprosy patients have got Aadhaar with whatever is left of their biometrics.”

Two days after the Express reported about Sajida’s Aadhaar woes, she received her pension for October but hasn’t received it for the months for August, September and November yet.
Leprosy patients elsewhere in the country are facing similar hardships.

There were about 86,000 leprosy patients in India as on April 1, 2014. Credit: Reuters/Rupak de Chowdhuri

According to the Leprosy Mission Trust India, there were about 86,000 leprosy patients in India as on April 1, 2014. But it seems that UIDAI authorities overlooked making special arrangements or exceptions for people with disabilities.
It was reported in July this year that residents of a village in Haryana that came up in 1969 with the primary objective of helping leprosy patients live a life of dignity, hadn’t received subsidised government ration for an entire month because the Aadhaar-linked biometric device at the village ration depot couldn’t verify their fingerprints.
Residents of the Indira Chakravarti village told  digital news platform FactorDaily that the Aadhaar cards of leprosy patients – both those who have fingers and those who don’t – were made using retina-based identification because their fingerprints don’t register on the biometric device.

However, ironically, the standard device that the government has provided at ration depots is capable of reading only fingerprints, which is why all 200 residents of the village went without ration in June. A villager said it was cruel joke that despite their disability, they are required to verify their fingerprints for food.

According to the Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies, 39% of all the ration shops in the country have started using biometric devices for distribution of ration.

In Jharkhand’s Jamshedpur, getting ration has been difficult for leprosy patients as their Aadhaar cards were made through their eyelids but when ration distribution system started through biometric, there was only the option of fingerprint registration.

In October this year, an 11-year-old girl in Jharkhand’s Simdega district died of starvation after her family’s ration card was cancelled for not being linked to their Aadhaar number. Kumari had not eaten for eight days before her death on September 28, according to a Scroll.in report.