In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 12, 2018

12935 - FB Live: Delhi Residents Want Aadhaar to be Revoked - The Quint


FB Live: Delhi Residents Want Aadhaar to be Revoked
AKANKSHA KUMAR2 DAYS AGO
NEWS2 min read


Residents of Kusumpur Pahadi, which is regarded as Delhi’s largest slum, are claiming that Aadhaar has made their lives more difficult. Scores of them have been denied rations, ever since Aadhaar-based authentiction was made mandatory in January this year.

The Quint spoke to the residents of Kusumpur Pahadi, some of whom had participated at a recent public hearing on Aadhaar.

Phoolmati, who is a domestic help, shared her ordeal – how she was made to wait for hours only to be told by the Fair Price Shop owner that the ‘server is down’. Connectivity problems are just the tip of iceberg, with residents claiming that though they have been denied their monthly quota of ration, records indicate ‘zero balance’ against their names for the month of January.

Buying food items from local kirana stores is burning a hole in the pockets of people at Kusumpur Pahadi, inhabited mostly by daily wage labourers.

When Rama Bai’s fingerprints didn’t match, she had to call her son from Rajasthan to use his biometric ID for availing of the 5 kgs of food grains allotted for her, as has been mandated by the National Food Security Act 2013.

Seventy-year-old Samo Devi who stays alone was not so lucky. She has been denied rations in January and February due to biometric authentication failure. Due to the absence of a grievance redressal mechanism, activists are alleging that Aadhaar has not been able to curb corruption and pilferage. Rekha, another resident of Kusumpur Pahadi, shared her experience on how she had to call her husband who was at work and it was his fingerprint that bailed out the family. ‘Angootha hatwa dijiye (revoke the clause of biometric authentication)’, said Urmila who said they’ve never faced such a problem earlier.

Testimonies of the residents of Kusumpur Pahadi will be submitted as evidence as the Delhi High Court continues to hear a plea challenging the Centre’s notification on making Aadhaar compulsory.

While policy-makers envisaged Aadhaar as one-stop solution for plugging leakages, the situation on the ground seems to suggest that such theoretical moves are in fact proving detrimental to the aam aadmi.

Also Read: Denial of Benefits May Not Mean Aadhaar Law ‘Unconstitutional’: SC

GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN
2 DAYS AGO
Wherever opponent parties ruling aadhar I'd compulsory. People at mercy of ruling government at center. Jai Hind.