In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, July 23, 2015

8274 - Return of native: Nandan Nilekani back on familiar grounds, wants to play active role in startups - Economic Times

Anirban Sen, ET Bureau Jul 14, 2015, 06.15AM IST

BENGALURU: A year after losing his first Lok Sabha election, Infosys cofounder Nandan Nilekani is back in action in the world of technology-end entrepreneurship, backing and mentoring early stage startups, and helping architect a new platform for mobile payments, among others.

Nilekani, who is also using his old government technology organisation eGovernments Foundation to build a backbone technology platform for cities across the country, on Monday said he was backing a startup that is currently on "stealth mode", where he is playing the role of an anchor investor. "I have an open-door policy for startups, so I have a lot of people who come and meet me," Nilekani told ET.

Nilekani, dressed in his trademark half-sleeve shirt and dark trousers, talked about Sunday's Wimbledon final where world number one Djokovic triumphed over Federer who Nilekani was rooting for.
"He (Federer) completely fell apart in the 3rd and 4th sets," Nilekani, 60, said, before getting into things that he's directly involved in.

"I spend about 2-4 hours a week meeting with various people," he said. "I have no financial interest in (these startups). For me it's also an education to understand how people are thinking, and they also like to come and bounce ideas off. I do that as a pro-bono service — it keeps me in the loop of what's happening."

Nilekani, who recently invested in aerospace startup Team Indus, intends to play an even more active role in mentoring startups in the near future and said he was "impressed" with the energy and the ideas coming out of the ecosystem.

"First of all, it (the local startup ecosystem) is very high energy, with a lot of capable young people...willing to break conventions and try new things. (They are) globally savvy, they understand the latest trends. So, I'm very impressed," he said.

Nilekani also hinted that he may quit politics for good.

"For me politics was a means to an end. I wanted to accelerate the change that I felt India needed... And I felt that many of the suggestions that I was making were not moving because people did not have a tech background to understand the potential of those ideas," he said. "So I thought that by being in the system I could get more done — but now I'm increasingly convinced that I can be effective by being outside the system. That's what I hope to be doing — from outside the system, making a difference. If I can be effective from outside, that's all that matters for me," he said.


Nilekani declined to confirm whether he was planning to leave Congress. "Right now I'm inactive. I'm still there, but I'm inactive. I don't want to say anything beyond that," he said. He confirmed something else though — that he was working with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), helping the retail payments organisation build an infrastructure for mobile payments called Unified Payments Interface, and that he was a mentor to iSpirt. "The other area which I look at is speed and scale. Because both my Infosys experience — where we created a multi-billion dollar company — and with Aadhaar — where we've come close to enrolling a billion people on Aadhaar — I think I've lot of experience in scale at speed," said Nilekani.

He said the fact that the current BJP-led government retained the Aadhaar project was a huge validation for what they achieved through the platform. "I think the prime minister is very tech savvy and understands how technology can be used for governance. So I think he was able to instantly grasp the strength of Aadhaar and they have actually supported it wholeheartedly and now it's been used for so many things. So I think the fact that it stood the tests of two governments is a good validation," he said.