In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

12870 - Selective freedom - Orissa Post

February 04 2018

1,336 total views, 89 views today

All those who propagate the idea of formalization, urbanization and industrialization also scream that agriculture is overburdened with nearly 60-70% of the population depending on it for survival.

Added to this, again according to them, is the ever fragmenting small land holdings that force this occupation to even greater heights of inefficiency.

According to them it contributes a mere 15% of the current GDP.

Conclusion is, move this vast humanity away from agriculture to alternative employment.
Sounds good.

Wonder what if those same bright chaps, under an opposite situation (say, like the one created by Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge) are asked to change profession and go to a village and do farming. Say a bare minimum farming expectation from that order, just enough to eat and survive themselves along with their own family?! 

Consider not capability. Would they even be willing to think of this as an alternative? To such a query, ‘they’ may vehemently say they need not ever have such a situation arising in their this life. They may even contemplate flying away to distant shores with their family and purchase new nationalities.

Regretfully, most Indians do not have such a choice.

The moment these ‘unproductive, low GDP generating and fragmented land owning impoverished agriculturist families stop doing what they are doing, India could certainly go into a nosedive of acute food shortages. With expensive-by-the-day oil imports, it is scary to imagine what would be the condition of the Indian economy if we were forced to import foodstuff (along with oil) to feed even half our population. 

Wonder where will these brilliant pro-change jokers go to wine and dine! Don’t forget, there might be hunger driven mobs waiting round the corner to bash those fancy cars to smithereens in front of some popular fine dining food joints! And we should believe such a situation is definitely not an impossibility in India, for all one has to do is look a little beyond and observe the conditions prevailing in many countries across Africa, not just sub-Sahara.

Another question that comes to mind is what methods are the government of India using to measure the GDP output of India’s farm sector. There are families, maybe millions, that simply grow enough food for themselves but do not sell anything in the mandi. Many of us personally know of a few such families which do that even now. And for other expenses they have a small snacks & tea stall operated by the wife or a son or two hawk newspapers every morning or operate a taxi or are busy in some such ‘informal’ occupation. How are these people measured in our oh-so-brilliant statistical system is a serious query. As far as can be noticed, these families, certainly there must be few millions in this vast nation, do not have any (or at best very little) socially formal economic interface by which they are recorded in full. Not a single government benefit scheme ever reaches them. They scrape through a bare minimum existence but are usually categorised as APL (Above Poverty Line). Thus proving that even this APL-BPL definition is skewed as far as true-to-life poverty is concerned. The advocates of Aadhaar have no clue of ground realities such as this part of the population.

We talk of implementing large schemes and are supposedly pushing in great amount of funds. Look at the results. Take for example the Government’s Skill Development initiative (PMKVY) which has now been decentralised and the funding is being redirected through the state skill development missions. The training service providers across India have not been paid for the PMKVY since August/Sept 2017. Except the large ones, most smaller training companies are struggling to survive. The state missions are lacking in vision and are concentrating mainly on plumbing, masonry and other low-yield sectors. Hospitality sector hasn’t really got much of a boost. On the other hand, the RPL scheme, which was primarily upgradation of existing skills, has itself not been upgraded to a large extent. Although a policy overhaul in the training mechanism is the key, that has not yet occupied enough mind space of our planners because that is not found vital in achieving the main goal. The evil of Aadhaar can be viewed here. It is a tool to be used by those same people clamouring for formalisation and all. These could be the targeted families who will be ‘moved’ to urban milieus and compelled to ‘readjust’ to the demands of the New Social Order. The efforts are to get this vast humanity to become the slaves for strengthening the New Social Order.

A few Masters. Bulk of the population Slaves.

Lower food production is the goal. The dream could be to control food supply, which alone can hold this ocean of human beings on a leash. Add to that the surveillance capabilities of Aadhaar which would be utilised to tighten the choke collar in instances of straying or disenchantment. Freedom will be for the select few rich Masters alone.