In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 7, 2018

12874 - Troubles getting ration: At public hearing, some Aadhaar woes as people face fingerprint failure, slow server - Indian Express



Aadhaar woes: Since January, beneficiaries have been asked to authenticate their identity using fingerprints to avail foodgrain they are entitled to under the Food Security Act.

Written by Krishn Kaushik | New Delhi | Updated: February 6, 2018 8:12 am

The public hearing was organised by two civil society groups, Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan and Satark Nagrik Sangathan

“Agar machine hata di jaaye, toh bohot acha hai.” As 60-year-old Shanno Devi said these words, 200 people gathered at a hall in central Delhi broke into applause. “Public pareshaan hai,” she added.

Devi was talking at a public hearing on Monday about the impact of Aadhaar being made mandatory for ration in Delhi. The machine she was talking about are the electronic point of sale (e-PoS) machines installed across all 2,254 ration shops in the city. Since January, beneficiaries have been asked to authenticate their identity using fingerprints to avail foodgrain they are entitled to under the Food Security Act.

A widow living alone, Shanno Devi tried to get ration in January, but was told her fingerprints could not be recognised. Delhi’s Aadhaar-enabled Public Distribution System (AePDS) data shows no history of Shanno Devi having ever tried to authenticate her identity — no successful or unsuccessful attempts. This means that the e-PoS did not decline her request to validate who she was; rather, it did not consider her authentication attempt valid at all.

Around two dozen people spoke at the public hearing, each with a peculiar problem in getting ration in January. At least three people — Mohini Devi, Uma Shankar and Phoolmati — said that when they tried to authenticate using fingerprints, they were told that their attempt had failed, and were not given foodgrain. But AePDS shows that each of them had a successful transaction. So, while they were denied the grains, their share for January has been consumed.

Mohini Devi, 77, said she tried four-five times in January, but in vain. Unlike older ration cards, which were like passbooks and recorded when and how much foodgrain each family was issued, under the new system people like Mohini Devi can find the status of ration left only when someone accesses the centralised database online.

Some mentioned that even though they are entitled to 5 kg of grain per person per month, people running fair price shops had been giving them less. Rihan Khatoon from Rohini mentioned that she was given 35 kg of grains for her nine-member family, instead of 45 kg. The shopkeeper’s reasoning: “Server slow chal raha hai.”

As of October 2017, Delhi had 19,41,970 ration cards, all seeded to Aadhaar numbers. This means that after new ration cards were made between 2013 and 2017, each ration card had been verified using Aadhaar. During the same period, 30,096 ration cards were deleted or cancelled.

But AePDS data shows that 15,15,769 ration cards were authenticated in January, while for 31,199 ration cards the authentication failed. That still leaves around 4 lakh ration cards, all seeded to Aadhaar, for which either nobody claimed ration in January or, like Shanno Devi, could not even register an attempt to get the grain.

For all the latest Delhi News, download Indian Express App