The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

9024 - Casting the DBT net wide: Puducherry’s experience - Hindu Businessline


The Union Territory has opted to distribute cash in lieu of foodgrains under the Central scheme, but this is not without challenges

November 2, 2015:  

It’s close to noon on a warmer-than-usual October day, and Ramalingam is at a fair price shop (FPS) at Sedarapet, in Puducherry. A mason, he is here to get his monthly quota of rice and wheat. He takes out his weathered ‘red’ ration card booklet and a smartcard and patiently waits his turn.
Ramalingam has been doing this for years and, on the face of it, it may seem that nothing has changed in the way he buys his foodgrain. But, everything — well, almost everything — has.
Since September, Ramalingam — and almost 1.5 lakh other Puducherry residents — have been getting part of their foodgrain subsidy as cash.

The daily wager gets food subsidies from the Centre as well as the State government.

While the State government gives him 10 kg of rice and 5 kg of wheat free every month, the Centre till now provided Ramalingam with 20 kg of rice. A family with the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) card used to get 35 kg.

But the Centre’s subsidy has now changed form. Instead of foodgrain, a red card-holder like Ramalingam gets ₹115 per household member (aged 14 and above); AAY beneficiaries get ₹809 per household per month.

“About 1,37,000 beneficiaries have received cash transfers directly to their accounts. The balance of 40,000 beneficiaries will be included by the end of this month,” said Priyatarshini, Additional Secretary-cum-Director at Puducherry’s Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs.

Apart from Puducherry, Chandigarh is the only one among the country’s States and Union Territories to have adopted the new system.

An ideal candidate…
The Puducherry government, led by Chief Minister N Rangasamy, was among the first to respond to the Centre’s Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) programme. The Union Territory claims 100 per cent financial inclusion, which means each of its citizens has a bank account. It also has about 95 per cent Aadhaar enrolment. Additionally, its supply chain, from grain storage to distribution, has been computerised, and the list of beneficiaries is available online, making the switch to DBT easier.

The new system also benefitted from the Supreme Court’s October 16 verdict, which ruled that a beneficiary no longer needs to produce his Aadhaar card to avail of social security schemes.

The DBT system has helped in reducing duplication, a rampant complaint in the traditional system of distributing foodgrains. In Puducherry, the system has eliminated about 25,000 bogus ration card-holders.

And, if States opt to completely do away with FPSs, as Chandigarh plans to, they can save on procurement, distribution and demurrage charges. Puducherry, for instance, spends ₹2 for every kilo of grain that it handles.

… and a unique one
Puducherry is among the few Union Territories, or States, that run the dual public distribution system (PDS). It suits the people here, who prefer the rice provided by the State government.
“People prefer the single boiled rice distributed by the local government over that which is provided by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) through the Central scheme,” said Priyatarshini.
The rice supplied by the FCI is double-boiled, which, while easier to store and transport, is of poorer quality and does not match local taste.
The Central scheme now moving to the DBT system is a blessing for the people of Puducherry. They will continue to get the preferred variety of rice (under the local government’s scheme), and additional money under the Central scheme of direct transfers.
For other States who might be weighing the option of shifting to DBT, Puducherry’s experience holds valuable lessons.
In a bid to replace the Union Territory’s distribution of rice with direct cash transfer — similar to the Central scheme — Chief Minister Rangasamy had launched a pilot project in March.
Instead of the monthly ration of 10 kg rice and 5 kg wheat, the Puducherry government transferred ₹300 to the bank account of every household’s head. He, or she, didn’t have to come to the FPS, but could use the money to buy the rice from any shop.

Challenges aplenty
This scheme, however, faced one too many challenges.
Ramalingam, for instance, preferred getting the foodgrains. “I might drink away the money,” he reasoned with an apologetic smile. Nearby, at another FPS, Manjula had a similar view. “It (collecting rice) is easier for us,” she said.
“With the bank transfer, I have to first check with the bank to see if my account has been credited, then come to the shop.”
For AAY card-holders and some red card-holders who might work for daily wages, a trip to the bank to draw the money, followed by one to the market to procure foodgrains, may cost a day’s earning.
Access to bank branches poses yet another problem. The waiting periods are long, since the ratio of bank branches to PDS shops is roughly 1:2 in Puducherry.
Most cash transfers and subsequent cash withdrawals at the bank branches tend to bunch up at the beginning of the month, stressing out bank staff. “Our elite customers also complain,” said a senior official at the local branch of a nationalised bank.
The DBT is done through the National Payments Corporation of India. This means a cash transfer is possible only if the user has an account with a bank that has a Core Banking System (CBS), and the account is seeded with Aadhaar. For households that hold accounts with co-operative banks without CBS, or who do not have an Aadhaar card yet, DBT cannot take place.
Critics also wonder if the money transferred is enough. The rates are fixed at 1.25 times the Minimum Support Price (MSP), which is always lesser than the market price.
“Therefore, in the absence of PDS or fair price shops, if customers are expected to buy from the open market, there is a possibility that they may not meet their macro-nutritional requirements,” said Outtiresvarne, President of the Humanity Service Centre, a voluntary consumer organisation in Puducherry.
A complete shift to a DBT system will displace the existing infrastructure of transporters, distributers and warehouses, all of whom depend on the current system of distribution for their livelihoods.
In Puducherry, 1,200 people are employed by the system.
Chief Minister Rangasamy discontinued the pilot project after two months.
The way forward
Despite the challenges, there are ways to improve the DBT experience for the likes of Ramalingam.
States that decide to retain FPSs should stock the variety of grains that is preferred by the local population.
“Also, the transfer of money should be conditional,” said a senior government official who requested anonymity. Beneficiaries could be provided with a pre-loaded card that can be used in a select set of shops to purchase food. This would reduce the burden on bank branches and make sure the money is spent on food and other necessities, rather than on temptation goods such as liquor.
The biggest concern for the poor is the loss of a day’s wages when forced to visit a bank to collect the money.
“They should expand the branch network and become people-friendly. The poor find a trip to the bank intimidating. They need to be made comfortable,” said the official.
(With inputs from TE Raja Simhan)
Jayshree Venkatesan works as an independent consultant in financial inclusion

(This article was published on November 2, 2015)