The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

9039 - UPA's Aadhaar architect Nilekani stars in NDA event - TNN

TNN | Nov 7, 2015, 05.03AM IST

NEW DELHI: Aadhaar architect Nandan Nilekani was a star speaker at a conference organized by the finance ministry where he complimented the government for putting its weight behind the Jan Dhan-Aadhaar-Mobile programme. Nilekani appreciated the Central government for continuing the Jan Dhan-Aadhaar-Mobile programme.

"I haven't been to Vigyan Bhawan for a long time," Nilekani said in his opening remarks as he unveiled the transformation that technology will usher in the days ahead in terms of delivery of public services. Nilekani, a former chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which ushered in Aadhaar during UPA-II, said the government should push the legislation in Parliament. 

"I think if the government can take up the matter in Parliament and get it done, it will put a lot of things behind us. We can do a lot of things now but the law would help us to really settle once and for all," said Nilekani, while commenting on how the government could overcome legal hurdles in the way of Aadhaar. 

The National Identification Authority of India (NIDAI) Bill is pending before Parliament. It has provisions about who can access the Central Identity Data Repository, which will be maintained and protected by the UIDAI. 

Oil minister Dharmendra Pradhan said, "We owned Aadhaar. We did not reject it. We are told we are a government of intolerants. We have not been intolerant to good work. If somebody has done good work we have continued with it." Nilekani, a co-founder of Infosys, said the country was at a critical juncture and technological revolution was waiting to happen but advised caution against allowing multinational companies in the area of authentication, KYC, lockers, mobile to mobile payments. 

"All this is a public good. This is not owned by companies. In the US all these things are owned by companies," he said. 

"I am not suggesting protectionism. You got the risk of becoming digital colonies. This is nothing but the British East India company back 200 or 300 years later because Silicon Valley will colonise you if you are not careful. Let me tell you I know this game," Nilekani said to a round of applause while reacting to Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian's comments that Nilekani was one of the few guys who can make protectionism "look sexy."