The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, January 20, 2017

10716 - Aadhaar-tatkal passport scheme has few takers - TNN

Krishnendu Bandyopadhyay | TNN | Dec 13, 2016, 09.42 AM IST

KOLKATA: Way back in January, the ministry of external affairs launched a scheme, under which applicants--on the lines of tatkal--could get a passport within seven days, before police verification, but without having to pay extra or submitting a proof of "urgency". All that they have to submit were copies of their Aadhaar cards, EPICs (electoral photo identity card), PAN (Permanent Account Number) cards and self-declarations that they did not have any criminal record. However, apparently owing to poor awareness, only a handful of people from Kolkata region have availed of the facility with most going in for the normal, longwinding process.

So far, the Kolkata region has issued only 1,686 passports under the Aadhaar-linked scheme, though the city unit alone processes 1,600 applications every day . The Kolkata region serves three states, Bengal, Tripura and Sikkim through four of its passport seva kendras (PSKs). 

"It was a revolutionary step announced by the ministry of external affairs. As the police verification is scheduled after the passport is issued, the applicants can get their passports within seven days and they do not even have to pay extra, unlike under the ordinary tatkal facility ," said Bibhuti Bhushan Kumar, regional passport officer, Kolkata. In case of the tatkal scheme, passports are issued within almost the same time but applicants have to furnish Annexure F, a verification certificate by a senior government officer. Very few officers are ready to issue such a certificate as they are often held responsible for any misdeed by the applicants; anyone issuing "incorrect verification certificate" could be prosecuted under section 12(2) of the Passports Act, 1967. Besides, for tatkal, applicants have to submit a proof of urgency .

But in case of Aadhaar, no such proof is required. Applicants face the most trouble in getting passports due to the long-drawn police verification procedure that can take 10 days to 300 days in Bengal. "But now that the police have started using the mobile app, mPassport, to submit the police verification report, the process has started becoming faster and less troublesome. We are receiving reports within 10 days. The Biddhannagar Commissionerate will next use mPassport app," said Kumar. With the online facility of uploading inspected documents to the central system from the spot, the mPassport system has proved to be a game-changer.