In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, May 21, 2010

7 - Court comes to the rescue of brokers' kin - P Vaidyanathan Iyer

Court comes to the rescue of brokers' kin,
P Vaidyanathan Iyer
New Delhi
Mar 19, 2004, 19:35

Sebi fiat on identification number set aside. ..Read

Sebi fiat on identification number set aside.

In a big relief to brokers, the Delhi High Court yesterday exempted their kin or dependents with no dealings in the capital market from obtaining a unique identification number as required by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi).

The Sebi-notified scheme, which aims at creating a central database of market participants, requires not just brokers but also their spouses, parents and children to provide biometric impressions of their left thumb, left index finger, right thumb and right index finger to National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL).

The ruling is a modification of the court’s February 27 order asking the regulator not to take any coercive action against brokers for non-compliance of the provisions relating to furnishing of biometric finger impressions of their kin.

It also said Sebi might reconsider the feasibility of asking specified intermediaries to file an affidavit with complete particulars of all related persons.

The high court today asked the petitioner, the National Stock Exchange Members’ Association, to present evidence of the hardship faced by brokers in meeting the Sebi stipulation before April 15. Sources in the association said a representation would be made to the regulator before March 31.

Sebi, in a circular dated January 1, 2004, had said specified entities would not be allowed to act as intermediaries if they did not acquire the unique identification number before March 31.

The list of entities required to obtain the number in the first phase included depositories, stock exchanges, members of the bourses, mutual funds, portfolio managers, underwriters, merchant bankers and custodians.

The regulator today said in Mumbai that market intermediaries could now make consolidated payment to obtain the unique identification number for their employees and dependents. Dependent minor children of natural persons would not be required to obtain the number, it added.

NSDL, which was entrusted with the task of allotting the unique identification numbers, had in turn appointed points of service catering to different regions.

The fee per applicant was Rs 300. As per the arrangement between NSDL and the points of service, the latter would pass on Rs 225 to NSDL while retaining Rs 75 per applicant for rendering the service.

In the second phase, the market regulator planned to extend the requirement to all shareholders.

Market sources said there were about 1,000 brokers across India who were concerned and unhappy about Sebi’s stipulation requiring them to provide biometric finger impressions of their dependents with no dealings in the capital market.

Mapping investors

  • Sebi Chairman G N Bajpai launches scheme to create a central database of market participants on November 25, 2003
  • National Securities Depository Ltd appointed to create and maintain the database
  • Spouse, dependent children and parents required to obtain unique identification number
  • First phase to cover depositories, stock exchanges, brokers, registrars and transfer agents, mutual funds and portfolio managers, among others

CLICK ON TITLE TO SEE ORIGINAL ARTICLE - Posted by