Why this Blog ? News articles in the Wide World of Web, quite often disappear with time, when they are relocated as archives with a different url. Archives in this blog serve as a library for those who are interested in doing Research on Aadhaar Related Topics. Articles are published with details of original publication date and the url.
Aadhaar
The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018
When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi
“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.
Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.
Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha
“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh
But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP
“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.
August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"
“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.
Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.
Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.
UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy
1) Denial
2) Issue fiats and point finger
3) Shoot messenger
4) Bury head in sand.
God Save India
Sunday, May 23, 2010
36 - A Law to Protect Privacy
Apr 26th, 2010 | Filed under Politics, PrivacyLeave a comment | Trackback
The recent phone tapping controversy in Parliament is a boon for us Indians. We’ve long needed a law to protect privacy in India, but till now no politician really cared about it. Under the guise of “security”, we were watching the legislature run roughshod over civil liberties and there seemed to hope in sight since the media was quite apathetic about it.
However, now that politicians themselves seem to have been subjected to privacy violations like phone tapping, there’s a big hue and cry in parliament. MPs would like to preserve their own privacy and since we obviously can’t have a law saying that only politicians are protected, they’re calling a for a law that covers everyone!
Phone tapping and privacy
The story is that the National Technical Research Organization was created after Kargil to take on terrorism. Turns out it was abusing its powers to tap into the phones of others including politicians. I’m very grateful that they chose politicians to pick on. At least that way our “leaders” will give a shit. To protect themselves from this, they’ll have to protect the rest of us as well.
L K Advani has called for a law to protect the privacy of Indian citizens. How fortuitous for us that he was tapped! I can only hope his demand will be taken seriously.
Incidentally this gives the lie to all who claimed that the Indian UID Number would not be abused. The lesson we must learn now is that when there is power, it will be abused given the chance. So we need proper checks and balances at the same time the power is given to any entity to preclude misuse. We shouldn’t have to wait until the abuse is exposed and then scramble to put the checks in place.
For once I’m glad that parliament is being help up. At least it’s over an important issue that needs urgent addressing. I would appreciate it if the opposition didn’t just walk out though. There must be a proper debate in the house over this point by point. Only then can the issue be thrashed out and a valid conclusion reached.
Similar Posts:
Indian Unique National ID will not include Personal Details – September 10, 2009
Trying to make the UID palatable to the common man – November 6, 2009
Worldwide attention on National ID cards in India – June 29, 2009
Why we shouldn’t give the Government too much Power – Savita Bhabi is Proof – July 15, 2009
Universal ID cards. A threat to privacy – December 11, 2006