In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

7482 - Budget 2015: Subsidy reforms high on Modi government's agenda - Economic Times

By ET Bureau | 2 Mar, 2015, 03.14AM IST

NEW DELHI: The government plans to actively pursue the next generation of subsidy reforms in 2015-16 with the help of universal Aadhaar coverage and more efficient procurement and distribution of foodgrains, steps that it believes will help reduce the burden of subsidy. 

The 'medium term fiscal policy statement', part of this year's budget papers, also stresses that the pricing reform in fertilisers is "urgently required" for proper fiscal consolidation. The Budget presented on Saturday deferred previously set fiscal targets to allow greater state funding in the infrastructure sector. 

"Without focused subsidy reforms, the process of fiscal consolidation will be difficult. The expenditure of government on major subsidies is projected to come down from 2.2% of GDP in 2013-14 to 2% of GDP in 2014-15. It is expected that with active policy reforms, the incidence will progressively reduce (to) 1.6% in 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively," the statement said. 

Reforms in food procurement and distribution are already on the agenda of the government, which is studying path-breaking recommendations of the Shanta Kumar panel, which has suggested use of direct cash transfer to help deregulate fertilisers and save Rs 30,000 crore a year in public distribution system (PDS). The panel has said direct cash subsidy of about Rs 7,000 per hectare to farmers will help decontrol fertilisers. 

The Budget documents signal an imminent push to reforms in the sector. "Decentralised procurement and distribution of foodgrain, end-to-end computerisation, combined with universal Aadhaar coverage, improving the operational efficiency of the Food Corporation of India (FCI) are some of the measures that will set the stage for the next generation food subsidy reforms," the medium-term fiscal policy statement has said, adding that the "government will actively pursue this during the course of this financial year". The government has also gained from the sharp fall in international oil prices, which has helped lift price controls on diesel, and better targeting of cooking subsidy, which is increasingly being transferred directly to bank accounts of customers. 

"With deregulation of diesel prices and rationalisation of LPG subsidy, it is expected that the provision for fuel subsidy kept in the Budget should suffice. However, increased allocation for food subsidy has been retained in view of additional requirements to meet the demand from National Food Security Act," it said. According to government officials, reforms in food procurement and distribution are important for not just better targeting of subsidies, but also plugging huge leakages. 

The Shanta Kumar panel said leakages range from 40-50% in some states to as much as 60-70%. For grain distribution, it recommended direct transfers in cities with population of more than one million, followed by grain surplus states, and giving an option to deficit states to opt for cash or physical grain distribution. The panel said that direct cash subsidy to farmers will help decontrol fertilisers and help plug diversion of urea to nonagricultural uses as well as to neighbouring countries. 

The government also recognises the problems in fertilizer subsidy, which also leads to abnormally high use of subsidised soil nutrients. "What is now urgently required are certain pricing reforms in the urea sector with an immediate price correction for urea, new nutrient based urea policy. This is not only essential from viewpoint of the size of the subsidy bill but also from the viewpoint of balanced use of N, P&K nutrients," it said. 

Read more at: