In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

7496 - Karnataka reaches saturation in Jan Dhan Yojana expansion - Business Standard


Since the launch of the scheme on August 28, 2014, banks have achieved a 98.37 per cent progress in the state


BS Reporter  |  Bengaluru  March 3, 2015 Last Updated at 20:40 IST

Karnataka has been declared as saturated in implementation of the Prime Minister’s Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) by the State Level Monitoring Committee. Since the launch of the PMJDY on August 28, 2014, banks have achieved a 98.37 per cent progress in the state, the State Level Bankers’ Committee (SLBC) said.

Banks have completed household survey in all the 7,627 sub-service areas (SSAs) and 4,559 wards in Karnataka state, covering 8.06 million households in SSAs and 5.13 million households in wards (totaling 13.20 million). As against this, banks have covered 7.96 million households in SSAs and 5.02 million households in wards by opening a minimum one account per household, thereby achieving a 98.37 per cent progress, T K Srivastava, executive director of Syndicate Bank and convener of SLBC said.

“The first important milestone of opening at least one bank account in the name of the family head of all the households in the state has been achieved. Now, the important task before us is to ensure that all the accounts opened do not continue with zero balance,” he said at the 130th meeting of SLBC, here on Tuesday. He said the issue of RuPay cards and their delivery, ensuring regular transactions in all these accounts and Aadhaar-linkage for the smooth transfer of funds is the next challenge for banks. Proper support and coordination amongst banks, government agencies, OMCs is imperative for hassle free transfer of funds/benefits directly to the beneficiaries’ accounts, he said.

“I appeal to the banks to extend the overdraft facility to all eligible account holders as per the norms after proper counselling. Banks should make sure that all the BCs appointed are made to function properly and they have the approved handheld device of 1.5.1 version fully active and operational for the AEPS and Rupay transaction,” Srivastava said.

Speaking on the occasion, Latha Krishna Rau, additional chief secretary and development commissioner, government of Karnataka, brought to the notice of the SLBC that the distribution of Rupay cards was inadequate and told the banks to ensure a proper distribution across the state.

She also suggested that the distribution of benefits should not be denied just because consumers are not linked their accounts with Aadhaar numbers.

Since the launch of the PMJDY programme and up to February 14, 2015, the banks have opened 6.22 million basic savings bank deposit accounts in Karnataka. Of these, 3.66 million accounts allow for zero balance and the remaining 2.56 million accounts have a balance of Rs 426.72 crore. The total number of accounts with Aadhaar seeding is 3.57 million. The number of accounts in the rural areas is 3.81 million and in urban areas it is 2.40 million. The banks have so far issued 5.15 million Rupay cards.

Of the 7,627 SSAs allotted, 5,293 are covered under fixed BC locations, 2,302 covered through branches, 5 covered through mobile vans and 27 SSAs are yet to be covered.