The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, October 2, 2015

8792 - RBI, Sebi move Supreme Court for Aadhaar clarity - Asian Age

Sep 30, 2015 - J.Venkatesan | New Delhi
The Supreme Court will hear on October 6 a batch of applications filed by RBI, SEBI, states of Gujarat and Jharkhand seeking modification of the interim order restraining the authorities from insisting on Aadhaar card for availing benefits from the government.

A three-judge Bench of Justices J. Chelameswar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan posted the applications for hearing after brief submissions from senior counsel Harish Salve and additional solicitor-general Tushar Mehta.

In its application, the Reserve Bank said the interim order should not prevent banks and financial institutions from accepting Aadhaar cards from persons who voluntarily submit the same for the purpose of proving their identity either in the absence of any other officially valid document or otherwise.
It also wants the court to clarify that the August order does not preclude the banks from verifying and accepting valid Aadhaar card as identification of customers in case so desired by the customer.

The Reserve Bank of India submitted that the order should not restrict banks/financial instituions, payment systems from verifying and accepting a valid Aadhaar card from willing customers wanting to avail banking/financial services and banks from seeding valid Aadhaar card numbers to bank accounts of customers for receiving government subsidy for other remittances.

“The banks and other FIs are required to know their customers before opening an account. This helps in preventing frauds. If the banks and FIs are required to stop using the Aadhaar car for these purposes, it would seriously retard the pace of financial inclusion for inclusive growth which is not in the interests of the poor people and the country at large,” the RBI’s application said.

In its plea SEBI said “ Aadhaar card can act as a single document for both proof of identity and addressd for an individual. It offers easy and simplified mode of completion of Know Your Client (KYC) requirements while on-boarding a client by any registered intermediary in terms of Prevention of Money Laundering norms. It can act as a tool for monitoring various transactions by individuals across financial markets and help in fraud detection.

Gujarat rejected the claim of right to privacy and said Aadhaar card enables benefits to the society at large, especially the marginalized and underprivileged sections of society.

In this entirely consensual process of accessing benefits from State and Central governments the question of individual’s right to privacy being affected or violated in any way does not arise.