The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholarUsha Ramanathandescribes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the#BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 15, 2016

9365 - Aadhaar abuse - Greater Kashmir

Type it in Urdu, your name is mud

Srinagar, Publish Date: Feb 13 2016 9:39PM | Updated Date: Feb 13 2016 9:39PM

Log in to the Aadhaar card software programme. Type your name see what does it read in Urdu. Infact see what happens to it when it's rendered in Urdu.

A lucky few see it correctly scripted, the rest are amused. What pops up is a word you might not have seen or read ever. As if monkeys have hammered on the keyboard of a character generator and you are seeing a queer combination of Greek, Latin and Sanskrit put together. Your name falls apart and you are renamed something too amorphous to be called a name. You are – to say the least – molested. 

Software experts say it happens with Urdu only. Can it be a mere incident or the fault is deliberate. Well, reading a conspiracy theory will be too hasty a conclusion, but the question remains. If the whole language software is corrupt, why does it effect Urdu only? In the first place how could it be allowed to operate in a state where the card-holders are predominantly Urdu readers. In a communally polarised nation, even if it's an error, it will be perceived as a plan. In a (now called) Modi-fied India, where plans are afoot to change the minority status of reputed educational institutions, Urdu abuse can't necessarily be an accident. 

`Aadhaar' is a revolutionary concept, thoroughly conceived and meticulously executed. Why doesn't  it occur to the concerned language software experts? Didn't they know that a substantial population of India want their English names to be written in Urdu. And when the very software denies to render your english letters in correct Urdu, where lies the problem? Does it require another revolution to create an Urdu data-base or the problem is of ordinary nature just allowed to persist. If it's an error it needs to be rectified. If it's deliberate, the responsibility must be fixed. 

The issue is not emotional or jingoistic, the issue is rational. By fouling the very language you are smearing the identity of a people. As an individual, you won't like to see a comic distortion of your name. Misnaming is construed as insult. This one is an insult to a community. If it happens with every other Indian language, then the problem is general. If it's Urdu specific, Urdu-targeted (which it seems to be), then  it demands attention. We don't mean inciting people in the name of language, we just seek a solution to a problem which – by all standards of logic – is a problem. If you are reviewing other aspects of Aadhaar, review this first. Set right the basics.