In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

9271 - Book Review; Privacy Law ;Principles, Injunctions and Compensation By Rishika Taneja and Sidhant Kumar, Eastern Book Company - Live Law



Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/privacy-law-principles-injunctions-and-compensation-by-rishika-taneja-and-sidhant-kumar-eastern-book-company/ 

Book Review; Privacy Law ;Principles, Injunctions and Compensation By Rishika Taneja and Sidhant Kumar, Eastern Book Company, 2014, Rs.1490, Pages 850 

The question whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution was considered recently in Justice K.S.Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Another vs Union of India by a three Judge bench of the Supreme Court.  The bench, however, referred the matter for determination by a larger Bench, because it agreed with the Attorney General, Mukul Rohatgi that the legal position regarding the existence of the fundamental right to privacy is doubtful.  The bench said that if the observations in M.P.Sharma and Kharak Singh cases are to be read literally and accepted as the law of this country, the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and more particularly right to liberty under Article 21 would be denuded of vigour and vitality.  The bench felt that the pronouncements made by larger benches of Supreme Court could not be ignored by the smaller benches without appropriately explaining the reasons for not following them.  The bench found certain amount of apparent unresolved contradiction in the law declared by this Court on the question. This book predates the order by the three-Judge bench placing the matter for determination by a larger bench, and this review appears at a time when the Chief Justice of India is yet to constitute such a bench.  Therefore, the public discourse on the issue does not find a mention in this book. However, the authors appear to be fairly convinced that the right to privacy is a fundamental right.  In Chapter 5, ‘Balancing Competing Rights’, the authors state that privacy is a right of equal measure as any other fundamental right.  Yet, they suggest that there are several instances wherein the societal or public interest is served by infringement in privacy; therefore, privacy does have to give way for larger public interest. In the Justice K.S.Puttaswamy case, it is alleged that the Central Government’s “Aadhaar” card scheme, which involves collection of biometric data of the residents of the country, is violative of the right to privacy.  Right to privacy, it is argued, is implied in Article 21. The book has a section on the Aadhaar Card Project in Chapter 27 dealing with E-Governance and Public Databases: Privacy concerns. The National Identification Authority Bill, 2010 comes for detailed scrutiny by the authors.  Citing the Report of the Group of Experts on Privacy, chaired by Justice AP Shah, the authors assert that the voluntary nature of the collection of biometric information is compromised. The authors are of the view that the Bill has grave implications for the rights of individuals to privacy and data protection particularly in the absence of any law that effect. The Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha by the Ministry of Planning on December 3, 2010 during the previous UPA regime and it has been pending since then.  It was referred to the Standing Committee on Finance, which submitted its report on December 13, 2011. The Committee had recommended that the government reconsider the UID scheme and introduce a new Bill.   More important, the committee felt that the passage of a national data protection law is pre-requisite before any law dealing with large scale collection of information from individuals and linkages across databases.  In the Aadhaar case before the Supreme Court, the Central Government defended the scheme, but there is no information on whether it is keen on reviving the pending bill in Parliament. The book has six parts. Fundamental principles and framework of privacy law are discussed under Part I.  Part II is the most interesting part in the entire book, with as many as six chapters discussing  the balancing of rights.  Freedom of expression, press freedom, privacy of public figures and celebrities, are some of the issues dealt with in this section. Part III deals with use of existing torts to protect privacy.  Defamation, breach of confidence, the tort of personality rights, use of tort actions for privacy protection and breach of privacy tort in Indian law are some issues discussed at length here. Part IV is on law enforcement and privacy.  Telephone tapping and online privacy issues get detailed scrutiny in Part V.  Privacy in Health records, social networking privacy and financial privacy are some issues dealt under Part VI. The book’s appendices include the relevant judgments of the Supreme Court, and the High Courts, statutory materials and legislative proposals. Although the book is comprehensive in its scope, it may require updating in the next few years, with the fate of the Aadhaar card scheme hanging in balance. Topics:EBC Justice K.S.Puttaswamy Justice K.S.Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Another vs Union of India Law Books Law Books Review privacy law right to privacy is a fundamental right Got Something To Say: Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Let us know what you have to say:

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/privacy-law-principles-injunctions-and-compensation-by-rishika-taneja-and-sidhant-kumar-eastern-book-company/