When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place. Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.” -A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty” and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” - Edward Snowden


Here is what the Parliament Standing Committee on Finance, which examined the draft N I A Bill said.

1. There is no feasibility study of the project]

2. The project was approved in haste

3. The system has far-reaching consequences for national security

4. The project is directionless with no clarity of purpose

5. It is built on unreliable and untested technology

6. The exercise becomes futile in case the project does not continue beyond the present number of 200 million enrolments

7. There is lack of coordination and difference of views between various departments and ministries of government on the project


What was said before the elections:

NPR & UID aiding Aliens – Narendra Modi

"I don't agree to Nandan Nilekeni and his madcap (UID) scheme which he is trying to promote," Senior BJP Leader Yashwant Sinha, Sept 2012

"All we have to show for the hundreds of thousands of crore spent on Aadhar is a Congress ticket for Nilekani" Yashwant Sinha.(27/02/2014)

TV Mohandas Pai, former chief financial officer and head of human resources, tweeted: "selling his soul for power; made his money in the company wedded to meritocracy." Money Life Article

Nilekani’s reporting structure is unprecedented in history; he reports directly to the Prime Minister, thus bypassing all checks and balances in government - Home Minister Chidambaram

To refer to Aadhaar as an anti corruption tool despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary is mystifying. That it is now officially a Rs.50,000 Crores solution searching for an explanation is also without any doubt. -- Statement by Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP & Member, Standing Committee on Finance

Finance minister P Chidambaram’s statement, in an exit interview to this newspaper, that Aadhaar needs to be re-thought completely is probably the last nail in its coffin. :-) Financial Express

The Rural Development Ministry headed by Jairam Ramesh created a road Block and refused to make Aadhaar mandatory for making wage payment to people enrolled under the world’s largest social security scheme NRGA unless all residents are covered.

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

9913 - LBS Colony razed, dwellers allege have not been given new houses - Hindustan Times

  • Monica Sharma, Hindustan Times, ChandigarhUpdated: Apr 30, 2016 12:45 IST
A disgruntled Sita Devi, who says she has not been allotted a flat by the UT, at the Lal Bahadur Shastri Colony, Sector 56, on Friday. (Gurminder Singh/HT Photo)

In the scorching heat, sitting on the rubble holding her one-year-old son, Swarno had no idea where to go with her children, after the UT estate office razed the Lal Bahadur Shastri (LBS) Colony, Sector 56, on Friday. The estate office removed 2,000 structures and shanties from 20 acres.

“I have no place to go now. My four children and I have both ration card and Aadhaar card, but still our family did not feature in the administration’s survey. Even though I have been staying here for 20 years, I have not been allotted a flat at the new colonies,” she said.

Illegal structures being razed. (Gurminder Singh/HT Photo)

Administration sources said 900 families living in the colony had been allotted houses at colonies coming up at Sector 38 (West), Mauli Jagran and Dhanas. Narrating a similar tale, 60-year-old Sita Devi said she has been rendered homeless. She said, “I have been staying here with my son for 30 years and yet a flat has not been allotted to me. I don’t know the procedure that the administration followed.”

Swarno and Sita Devi were not the only ones claiming that even after staying in the colony for last so many years they were still not allocated space. Another 65-year-old woman Sarfi Devi showed her voter identity card, Aadhaar and ration cards and rued she still was not in the list of allottees.

Rentals touch Rs 5,000
To add to the woes of those rendered homeless, rent of the houses located nearby has doubled to Rs 5,000 per room from Rs 2,500. UT estate office enforcement staff arrived at the colony on Friday at 7am, armed with JCBs. UT DC Ajit Balaji Joshi, SDM (South) Kriti Garg and Tehsildar (enforcement), estate office, Amarinder Singh Manais monitored the drive.
A picture of complete devastation could be witnessed at the colony by afternoon as the shanties and other structures were razed by the enforcement staff.

Prior to the coming up of LBS in 2003, there was Peer Colony at the same place which had come up in 1990s. After the Peer Colony was removed, the new colony sprung up.