In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, May 30, 2016

10045 - Two years of Modi: Reforms on track but toughest economic tasks still pending - First Post


Dinesh Unnikrishnan  May 26, 2016 12:32 IST

On 26 May, 2014, the former Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi, took over as India’s Prime Minister with the promise of good days (achhe din) for all. There was euphoria all over. Has he delivered the promises after two years? The answer would depend on how you define good days, who you would ask and in what context.


But even his political enemies wouldn’t doubt Narendra Modi’s intent and ambition to push forward the reforms process. In an interview given to Wall Street Journal, Modi spoke on his government’s efforts to continue with the reforms process and his ‘enormous task ahead’. Modi told the WSJ journalist that when he took over two years back and asked experts to define what are big-bang reforms “nobody could tell me”. We don’t know who the experts Modi spoke to. They are either dimwits who pretend to be experts or experts who pretend to be dimwits.

Whatever it is, the fact is India’s agenda on the so-called big bang economic reforms were listed and discussed across forums from day 1 of the Modi-government. One would broadly categorise them into taxation (read GST), land acquisition, labour, banking, investment liberalization and subsidy reforms.

Reforms on track
Two years after he took over the charge from the UPA-government with a historic mandate and 3-years before his term comes to an end, Modi is right on track of reforms front — not through big bang reforms, but several small, baby-steps.
Most notably, the government has set the juggernaut in motion by kicking off the process in the area of subsidy reforms. It has done so by promoting Aadhaar-bank account linkage for the roll out of Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT). The LPG subsidy roll out through DBT was indeed a great move by this government to curtail leakage and diversion of government funds--something that distorted the system for long.

In the next three years, the government should enhance the reform task to food, fertilizer and other government benefits to the poor. The passage of Aadhaar Bill is a great enabler. The whole subsidy reforms process, which was first kicked off by the UPA-regime, is built on the DBT channel, based on the unique identity number, or Aadhaar card provided to each citizen. It holds particular importance for the Narendra Modi government, and the success of its financial inclusion push under the JAM (Jan Dhan, Aadhaar and Mobile) trinity. With 99.21 crore Aadhaar cards already been issued to almost 97 percent of the country's adult population, taking ahead the subsidy reforms process using this channel is a logical step for Modi.

Now let's look at the investments scenario. Liberalization of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) norms and ‘Modi roadshows’ in numerous foreign trips, with the ‘India is where you should be” slogan, have evidently helped to the spike in inward fund flows.

The FDI inflows has grown by 29% to $40 billion in the fiscal year ending March. But, that doesn’t mean the task is accomplished. The absence of revival in private investment cycle is still acting as a drag on the economy on multiple fronts. New projects are yet to happen in a major way and the existing stock of stalled projects continues to be a pain.
According to this report in Mint, an increase in the number of stalled projects for three successive quarters has brought them to their highest level since Modi became the PM. The chunk of stalled projects has gone up from Rs 9.6 lakh crore in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015 to Rs 11.4 lakh crore in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016.

The absence of fresh private investments becomes even a greater problem seen in the backdrop of bank funding drying up to industries. Huge NPAs on bank balance sheets have forced banks to shut funding channels. Also, severe capital scarcity in the case of state-run banks has further constrained banks' ability to fund the economic growth.
Over the next three years, Modi’s big task would be to convince the private investors to finance India’s infrastructure projects--something essential to fire up an aspiring economy.

When it comes to banking sector reforms, the passage of the bankruptcy law is a major step in the process of overhauling the country’s Rs 101 lakh crore banking sector, even though implementation is key. Bankruptcy code passage also helped the Modi-government to break the reforms jinx in successive parliament sessions battered by controversies and political blame games.

But big challenges remain
But Modi's task is half-done yet. If the ongoing spike in bank NPAs continue for another few quarters, state-run banks will face a crisis situation if the government fails to bail out these entities. Averting a banking sector crisis will be one of the three major tasks that will be used to evaluate Modi’s tenure as pointed out in this article.
The NPA situation in the banking sector offer warning signals. At least 11% of the total loans in the banking sector are tagged under the stressed asset category. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) beginning the clean-up exercise has shown the actual depth of the trouble on the books of Indian banks (hidden bad loans), especially state-run lenders.

With over 90% of the total bad loans (of Rs 4,00,000 crore) on the books of Sarkari banks controlled by the government, the onus of capitalising these lenders and making growth capital available to them is on the government. In the March-quarter, PSU banks have reported record level of bad loans resulting in cumulative losses of over Rs 14,000 crore in the quarter.

While the clean-up exercise should be done sooner than later, the question is whether the government has an action plan to address the problem. What it has already announced — Rs 70,000 crore by 2019 — is too little and has come too late. A crisis in the banking sector can upset the calculations.

The government will have to seriously reconsider its privatisation strategy and let go of control of some of the state-run banks to facilitate inflow of private sector money. In the long-term, the biggest reform banking sector need is privatisation since government cannot keep on feeding banks. In other words, time is running out for Modi to undertake radical reform measures in the banking industry.

The issue of land reforms is more or less off the table now. Since land acquisition is more or less is a state–specific affair now, there isn’t much the central government can do about. Secondly, GST remains a paper dream and an unfulfilled promise of Modi-government. Subsuming several state levies into one, GST can significantly push up the GDP by 1.5%-2% going ahead. But, the challenge for Modi is to gain consensus of opposition to push through GST. Even though the composition of Rajya Sabha, where BJP is currently weak in numbers, will change in 2016-17, it wouldn’t be enough still to gain majority support.

The BJP will have to devise a strategy garnering the support of regional parties and thus force the Congress to return to the consensus path. Of the three major demands the Congress party has raised on GST — inclusion of the GST rate in the constitution, doing away with the inter-state levy and constituting an independent dispute resolution mechanism — the major point of difference is capping GST in the Bill. The government has failed to push the GST bill and has yet again promised the same in the monsoon session. It will be a test of Modi’s political strategy.

Thus, if one looks at the broader picture, in the two years of its rule, the Modi-government has set the stage ready for a big reforms push. But, what is certainly not warranted is the chest-thumping on 7.6% GDP growth chorus by Modi and his ministers. The tag of a fastest growing major economy is, as of now, just a small arithmetic comfort.

The situation hasn’t changed much on the ground with pain visible on account of absence of fresh private investments, huge stock of bad loans, faltering rural economy and 17-months of consecutive contraction in exports.

In his recent interview to NDTV, former disinvestment minister Arun Shourie said Modi is mostly managing headlines than addressing the actual problems in the economy. With baby-step reforms well on track, Modi should now focus on addressing the big-ticket items in the list (GST, banking sector reforms) and let the result of his work manage the headlines rather than his talks