In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

9948 - RTE seat allotment not free of glitches yet - The Hindu

BENGALURU, May 8, 2016


RTE seat allotment not free of glitches yet

Trying their luck:Children inaugurating the online draw of lots for RTE seat allotment along with Ajay Seth, Principal Secretary, Department of Primary and Secondary Education, in Bengaluru on Saturday.— Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy

Department has not been able to weed out duplicate applications
Despite introducing a slew of measures to “tighten” the verification system, the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) has still not been able to weed out duplicate applications for the Right to Education (RTE) Act quota seats in unaided schools.
The online process of RTE quota seat allotment this year was not free of glitches. The draw of lots for allotment of 1.15 lakh seats (LKG and class 1) across the State was held on Saturday.
Of the 2.74 lakh applications submitted, nearly 1.87 lakh were categorised as eligible for the draw of lots. Nearly 87,000 applications were rejected owing to duplication and errors in either Aadhaar or Electors Photo Identity Card (EPIC) details. For the first time, the department this year had asked respective agencies to verify the income, caste, Aadhaar and EPIC details of the applicants. Prior to this, DPI officials used to verify these documents.
In spite of taking these steps, the department said there are at least 12,000 duplicate applications.
Nearly 7,000 parents whose applications were initially approved by the department got SMSs two days ago stating that their applications were not valid and that they had only a few hours to rectify them.
Sources in the department, who acknowledged that there was “scope for improvement” in the entire system, said the applications of these 7,000 parents were considered valid provisionally and the parents would have to update their details if a seat is allotted to their child.
Although the draw of lots was conducted on Saturday, parents had not got the confirmation SMS from the department until late on Saturday night.
Another chance

Meanwhile, parents who failed to apply for RTE quota seats or whose children failed to obtain seats under the quota can apply for around 8,000 seats that have received no applications.
The 8,000 seats are in 300 schools which received no application at all and in 1,342 schools which received fewer applications than the number of seats.
Ajay Seth, Principal Secretary, Department of Primary and Secondary Education, said that fresh applications could be submitted for these seats but in their respective municipal ward only.
Mr. Seth said that helpline would be available for parents to complain if private schools demand fee for children who obtain seats under the quota.


Fact sheet
Nearly 2.74 lakh applications were submitted
Of them, nearly 1.87 lakh were categorised as eligible for the draw of lots
87,000 applications rejected owing to duplication and errors in either Aadhaar or EPIC details

CLICK ON TITLE TO SEE ORIGINAL ARTICLE - Posted by
Labels: