uid

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place. Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.” -A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant. Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty” and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” - Edward Snowden

Special

Here is what the Parliament Standing Committee on Finance, which examined the draft N I A Bill said.

1. There is no feasibility study of the project]

2. The project was approved in haste

3. The system has far-reaching consequences for national security

4. The project is directionless with no clarity of purpose

5. It is built on unreliable and untested technology

6. The exercise becomes futile in case the project does not continue beyond the present number of 200 million enrolments

7. There is lack of coordination and difference of views between various departments and ministries of government on the project

Quotes

What was said before the elections:

NPR & UID aiding Aliens – Narendra Modi

"I don't agree to Nandan Nilekeni and his madcap (UID) scheme which he is trying to promote," Senior BJP Leader Yashwant Sinha, Sept 2012

"All we have to show for the hundreds of thousands of crore spent on Aadhar is a Congress ticket for Nilekani" Yashwant Sinha.(27/02/2014)

TV Mohandas Pai, former chief financial officer and head of human resources, tweeted: "selling his soul for power; made his money in the company wedded to meritocracy." Money Life Article

Nilekani’s reporting structure is unprecedented in history; he reports directly to the Prime Minister, thus bypassing all checks and balances in government - Home Minister Chidambaram

To refer to Aadhaar as an anti corruption tool despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary is mystifying. That it is now officially a Rs.50,000 Crores solution searching for an explanation is also without any doubt. -- Statement by Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP & Member, Standing Committee on Finance

Finance minister P Chidambaram’s statement, in an exit interview to this newspaper, that Aadhaar needs to be re-thought completely is probably the last nail in its coffin. :-) Financial Express

The Rural Development Ministry headed by Jairam Ramesh created a road Block and refused to make Aadhaar mandatory for making wage payment to people enrolled under the world’s largest social security scheme NRGA unless all residents are covered.


Thursday, April 13, 2017

11032 - All-pervasive Aadhaar - Frontline


Print edition : April 28, 2017

By making Aadhaar mandatory for subsidies, pensions and a host of other benefits, the government is fast succeeding in its project to bring everyone on board. 

By RAMESH CHAKRAPANI

The Narendra Modi-led government’s recent decrees making Aadhaar mandatory for those seeking to receive a host of government benefits, and even for obtaining mobile connections, and for actions such as filing income tax returns, have removed every pretence that enrolment in the universal identity card scheme is voluntary any more. It is yet another instance of the government arm-twisting the citizens into signing up for the scheme despite the official promise since its inception that it would not be made mandatory and subsequent apex court statements supporting it.

One of the biggest areas of impact is the Centre’s direct benefit transfer mission involving tens of crores of beneficiaries and several thousand crores of rupees every year. According to data from www.dbtbharat.gov.in, some 32.92 crore beneficiaries received a total of Rs.1,61,620 crore in subsidies, assistance, or other forms of benefit in the four years between January 1, 2013 and January 31, 2017. The transfers involved payments made to workers under the MGNREGS scheme, cooking gas subsidies, scholarships and social assistance. Overall, the seeding of Aadhaar with beneficiaries’ data was 78 per cent. 

However, only 27.37 per cent of all funds transferred were through the Aadhaar Payments Bridge, “a system that facilitates seamless transfer of all welfare scheme payments to beneficiary residents’ Aadhaar-enabled bank accounts”.

The government has made Aadhaar mandatory for mid-day meals too, impacting the lives and education of millions of children. Statistics from the Ministry of Human Resource Development show that at least 10 crore children across the country benefit from the mid-day meal scheme, whose budgeted estimate dipped from Rs.11,937.00 crore in 2012-13 to Rs.9,236.40 crore in 2015-16 before rising again to Rs.9,700 crore in 2016-17.

As on March 15, 2017, seven States and the Union Territory of Lakshadweep had achieved 100 per cent Aadhaar saturation on the basis of a projected 2015 population, according to the Unique Identification Authority of India. Using the same yardstick, 11 States had achieved 90-99 per cent saturation.