In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, September 7, 2017

11993 - Educationists on why linking Aadhaar in schools is a terrible idea- Catch News


| Updated on: 5 September 2017, 16:35 IST

After facing huge embarrassment in the hands of two consecutive toppers’ scam in two years, the Bihar School Education Board (BSEB) has made Aadhaar mandatory for filling up forms for matriculation and intermediate examinations from the year 2018.

However, from 2019, Aadhaar number will be mandatory in all examinations conducted by the BSEB for all classes; identity cards will become inadmissible.

Earlier this year, the results of intermediate (arts) led to a row after it was detected that topper Ganesh Kumar, alias Ganesh Ram, fudged his age to take the exam a second time from Sanjay Gandhi Vidyalay, Lakshminia in Samastipur.

He showed his date of birth as June 2, 1993. Later, it was found that his actual date of birth when he took the matriculation exam for the first time was November 7, 1975 and he appeared from a school in Jharkhand. He later got into Ramnandan Singh Jagdip Narayan Intermediate College, from where he topped in Intermediate Arts.

However, linking Aadhaar to school examinations to stop cases of fraud may not be the way to go.

There are many issues that the children enrolling for Aadhaar might face. For instance, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) recognises that the fingerprints of a growing child aren’t completely formed till the age of 14-15 years. The students appearing for matriculation examinations are usually 14-15 years of age. And once BSEB makes Aadhaar for all classes, many glitches in identification might begin to surface.

Right To Education National Convenor Ambarish Rai believes that basic amenities should be kept out of the ambit of Aadhaar. He told Catch, “The Supreme Court has made it clear that basic amenities should not be linked with Aadhaar. Education is a basic amenity. If Aadhaar is made mandatory for education as well, then many children who do not have Aadhaar will not be able to avail benefits of education. They will be deprived. In a state like Bihar, the percentage of population that has an Aadhaar is one of the lowest.

“In order to avoid cases of fraud, the state should strengthen its school administration system. How can you not discriminate between genuine children who do not have Aadhaar and the ones who are indulge in fudging and forgery of documents and other such means?

“As the justice system says, it is okay for a guilty person to walk free but an innocent person must never be convicted. It is the same case here. An innocent child who does not have access to Aadhar must not be deprived of an education,” he added.

Praavita, a member of Rethink Aadhaar campaign, told Catch: 

“The system of Aadhaar by design excludes. They are many ways in which it is already proved that this system fails. In many cases that we are following, in the public distribution system, in mid-day meal schemes, there are instances of fraud in spite of Aadhaar being in place.

“There is enough evidence that Aadhaar’s supposed uniqueness to the identity does not stop fraud. What is does in practice is exclude people. It will make more and more difficult for children in very vulnerable positions to get an education or to pass matriculation.”

Praavita added: “Aadhaar card will not prevent forgeries or fraud, you can get a fake Aadhaar card made for Rs 35 in Maharashtra. In Rajasthan, a dealer had seeded his Aadhaar card with dozens of other people, so he was able to collect grains for all of them.

“It is ridiculous that the government continues to use this as a method to prevent fraud when across the country we have evidence of how Aadhaar is being misused.”

The CBSE has also made the Aadhaar card mandatory for all students taking JEE and NEET exams.

However, CBSE has not made Aadhaar mandatory for its school examinations as of now. Many other states may soon make Aadhaar mandatory for school examinations too.

Edited by Joyjeet Das

First published: 4 September 2017, 23:55 IS