In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, September 26, 2017

12125 - No decent jobs for this community in Bengal as they have ‘fake fathers’ - Hindustan Times

KOLKATA Updated: Sep 24, 2017 08:10 Ist

Hindustan Times, Kolkata


A number of people face problems as the name of the father on their Aadhaar and voter identity cards doesn’t match that on their school-leaving records.(HT File Photo)

Two years ago, Sapikul Ali Miyan was ecstatic.
The 21-year-old had just become an Indian citizen, one of 15,000-odd Bangladeshi immigrants living in enclaves in West Bengal whom India decided to formally accept as part of a landmark agreement.
Miyan and others looked forward to identity cards that would open doors to `formal education, jobs and a better life, free from the constant fear of deportation and persecution. Many in the enclave described the day as a second independence day.
But now, the same identity cards have come back to haunt them. Miyan, now 23, wants to join the army but is stuck – the name of his father on his Aadhaar and voter identity cards doesn’t match that on his school-leaving records.

The reason: Miyan is one of 1000-odd people who used names of their neighbour or family friend in place of their father on school records because they weren’t eligible to study in Indian schools.
Miyan, son of Asgar Ali Miyan of Poaturkuthi village, used the name of a family friend -- Lutfar Mallick of Patharda village – in his school records because the latter was an Indian citizen.

He said he did it because the Bamanhat High School in Dinhata wouldn’t admit a child from the enclaves, which were embedded in India geographically but didn’t belong to any country. “There are many in our locality willing to join the Army. However, there is no way one can even apply since we are all stuck with school leaving certificates carrying the wrong father’s name and address,” says Miyan, 23.

Most of the 1,000-odd young men and women are in their 20s and 30s but forced to work as part-time labour, masons and agricultural labour. They say the government should have created some provision because forging fathers’ names was the only way they could access education.


“Everybody born in the enclaves had to use fake fathers and addresses to get enrolled in schools. However, about 1,000 youths who are in the job market now face this problem,” said Diptiman Sengupta, convener of the Bharat Bangladesh Enclave Exchange Coordination Committee that spearheaded the dwellers’ movement for citizenship.

In July 2015, India and Bangladesh swapped enclaves in each other’s territory as part of a historic agreement that took 40 years to finalise. India took in 14,856 people living in 51 Bangladeshi enclaves and Bangladesh accepted 37,369 living in 111 Indian enclaves -- 979 of whom chose Indian citizenship.
On the Indian side, the enclaves were strewn across West Bengal’s Cooch Bihar district comprising of expansive plains where the international border was often a paddy field or an electric pole with few patrolling soldiers.

Families in these areas had lived in harmony for several generations, and would effortlessly cross the open border. Locals said the “fake fathers” agreed to let enclave dwellers use their names out of empathy and some also paid visits to schools when guardians were called.

Sengupta argued the case was exceptional and needed the government to adopt a policy for allowing corrections. “Otherwise, the past will continue to haunt them forever. The issue needs to be raised in the assembly but the local MLA is silent,” said Sengupta.

Local Trinamool Congress leader and Dinhata MLA, Udayan Guha, said the administration was looking into the matter. Kaushik Saha, the district magistrate, told HT that he was not aware of the problem as he was new to the district.

“I have been travelling from pillar to post and have written from the local block development officer, chairman of school education board to the chief minister and the President of India, requesting that we should be allowed to rectify our school records and certificates. We have no heard from anyone so far,” said Rahaman Ali, son of Naskar Ali, who has the name of neighbour Shahar Ali as father in school documents.

A batch of students also met officials from the secondary and higher education boards in the state. Officials told them that the records cannot be changed without a bill passed in the assembly.


But Miyan isn’t giving up hope. “We fought for decades to get our citizenship. We will fight through this.”