In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, September 25, 2017

12119 - Modi government’s pet e-Sampark database hits privacy roadblock - The Print


22 September, 2017

Days before Supreme Court judgement on privacy, health and railway ministries had raised concerns over sharing citizens’ details for the new database.

Before the Supreme Court delivered its landmark judgement on privacy being a fundamental right, the Narendra Modi government’s massive people-contact database initiative, e-Sampark, had already hit a privacy roadblock.

As the debate over privacy raged on, the health and railway ministries had red-flagged the new initiative due to privacy concerns at a meeting of top officials on 11 August.

e-Sampark is an IT platform for government-to-government and government-to-citizen communications, which will use mailers, outbound dialling, and SMS campaigns.

The government considers e-Sampark key to its communications strategy. It is also considered very useful for targeted campaigns based on geography, gender, occupation etc. The government intends to scale it up in a big way, with plans for a much larger citizen database, besides a comprehensive database of all government functionaries.

Concerns raised
The e-Sampark meeting of top officials was held at the Cabinet Secretariat by a specially-formed Group of Officers, where it was decided that all central and state government departments should share their database of officials by the end of the month with the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MEITY).

The Ministry of Railways committed to sharing the database of its 10 lakh employees, but also conveyed that it “may not be able to share the citizens’ database available with IRCTC due to privacy concerns”.

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, meanwhile, pointed to concerns over seeking patient details. It told the Group of Officers that while citizens’ databases may be compiled using patients’ registration data at various hospitals and health centres, this would “need to be examined from the privacy point of view”.

After these ministries expressed reservations, it was decided that ministries may “examine the possibility of dynamically sharing the citizens’ databases at their disposal, after duly examining the privacy concerns involved”.

Other ministries more forthcoming
Many other ministries were more forthcoming with citizens’ data. The rural development ministry, for example, had already shared data of government functionaries, and said it could immediately share details of 10 crore MGNREGA beneficiaries and 2.5 crore beneficiaries from the housing database.

The women & child development ministry offered to share mobile numbers and other details of 25 lakh anganwadi workers.

The human resource development ministry said email addresses of students, especially those studying in centrally-funded higher education institutes, could be collected. The database of Vidya Saksharta volunteers could also be shared, it said. The school education department indicated that was likely to share telephone numbers and email addresses of school teachers.

The panchayati raj ministry was open to sharing the database of sarpanchs and panchayat secretaries, but would take some months to put together details of other elected representatives of panchayats.

Allaying fears
Gaurav Dwivedi, CEO of citizen engagement platform MyGov, who was present at the meeting, sought to allay privacy fears related to the database, specifying that it did not require Aadhaar details. He said database fields had been chosen in such a way that private information like bank accounts, biometric data, and so on were not required.

It was finally decided at the meeting that all ministries and departments would collect and share the complete database of all central government functionaries working in their domain by 31 August, and of all state government functionaries by 30 September.

It was also agreed that privacy issues on the citizens’ database would be examined, and details would be shared with the MEITY.