In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, September 21, 2017

12092 - Modi govt rewards 'lucky Indians' with Rs 200 crore Jan Dhan account winners have received Rs 1,100 on an average - Business Standard


Sai Manish |  New Delhi 
Last Updated at September 19, 2017 15:58 IST

The Modi administration in a bid to incentivise the use of digital transactions has doled out Rs 200 crore as cash rewards, government statistics show. The biggest beneficiaries of the government’s largesse have been RuPay debit card holders. These debit cards were issued to 220 million people while opening their bank accounts under the Jan Dhan programme for getting India’s unbanked population into the formal banking sector.

Government statistics show that almost 1.6 million people were rewarded with cash – varying from Rs 1,000 to Rs 1 crore. Out of these, 1.38 million winners – or 87% of them - were RuPay debit card holders. On an average, the Modi government seems to have rewarded these RuPay debit card users holding a Jan Dhan account with almost Rs 1,100 each.

These rewards were given as part of the government’s ‘Lucky Grahak’ (lucky customer) scheme introduced post-demonetisation to accelerate the adoption of digital payment technologies. While Jan Dhan account holders seem to have been the biggest beneficiaries of the government’s cash rewards, others also got a share of the pie.

The second biggest beneficiaries of the government’s largesse were around 150,000 people who transacted through Aadhar Enabled Payment Systems (AEPS). Around 50,000 people who used Unified Payment Interface (UPI) and a few thousand people who transacted through Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD) platforms were also rewarded with cash.

These cash rewards are in line with NITI Aayog’s action plan to incentivise people in a bid to wean them away from hoarding cash. The government’s think-tank had been especially keen on pushing RuPay debit cards and AEPS systems in various spheres. It had suggested setting up a fund to incentivise banks to setup infrastructure capable of handling AEPS and RuPay debit cards in rural and semi-urban areas. The NITI Aayog in its interim report on digital transactions earlier this year had noted, “In order to minimize the need for cash during the ensuing kharif season (March-April 2017), all the 150,000 fertiliser dealers and other input dealers should be ready to accept RuPay cards and Aadhaar biometric authentication based cashless payments from farmers for purchase of fertilizers and other inputs.” It had also suggested making all transactions at ration shops cashless through use of RuPay cards and Aadhar based payments by June 2017.

But have these cash rewards by the government managed to achieve what they sought out to in the first place? By the look of it, these cash rewards do not seem to have encouraged people to swipe their RuPay debit cards more. Infact ever since the government announced these cash rewards at the beginning of the year, there has been a gradual decline in the value of RuPay debit card transactions. Information available with the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) shows that RuPay card transactions have fallen by a third between January and April this year. The number of times people swiped these cards at machines have also fallen gradually. On the positive side, the Modi government can take heart from the fact that demonetisation has pushed more people into using RuPay cards and other payment systems more than ever. The value of RuPay transactions in April this year was almost equivalent to what people transacted in the whole of 2015-16.

There are also serious doubts about the actual inclusivity of the government’s Jan Dhan scheme that sought to give every unbanked Indian a bank account. A report released by Grameen Foundation in collaboration with JP Morgan earlier this month doesn’t paint a promising picture of the effectiveness of the Modi government’s financial inclusion scheme. The report surveyed over 25,000 low income and below poverty line individuals in Uttar Pradesh and Delhi. Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state saw the maximum number of bank accounts opened under the Jan Dhan programme. The report found that almost half the number of surveyed people in rural areas and a third of the people in urban areas still did not have a bank account. Among those who had a bank account, usage was negligible. The report notes, “Over a third (35%) of bank accounts held in the sample had witnessed no transaction in the past three months and over a fifth (21%) had witnessed no transactions over the past six months. These figures were surprisingly more pronounced in the urban part of the sample, Delhi/NCR region, where over 40% of accounts were not in use for over 3 months.”

While quite visibly, the Indian government hasn’t been successful in using cash rewards to make people keep swiping their RuPay cards or use their bank accounts to transact more, nations across the world have been experimenting with using cash rewards to induce behavioral changes among citizens.

Japan, for instance, enacted the Kodomo Teate Law in 2010 to stem the fall of its population. The law enacted by the then Yukio Hatayama government gave 13,000 Yen (almost Rs 7,500) every month to every parent with a child till the age of 15. Although there is been a marginal improvement in Japan’s birth rate since the time the law was enacted, for the first time in Japan’s history, the number of babies born will be fall below a million in 2017. Singapore too amended its Child Co-Development Savings Scheme in 2001 under which anyone having more than two children could get a maximum of S$8,000 (almost Rs 3.8 lakh). However, Singapore’s birth rate has been in freefall ever since the scheme was introduced. Earlier this year, China introduced a cash incentive for citizens to catch foreign spies on Chinese soil. The Beijing National Security Bureau offered 500,000 Yuan (almost Rs 50 lakh) to any Chinese who managed to net a foreigner spying on China. It is unclear whether anyone has been rewarded for spy-busting by the Chinese government so far.

While Modi may not want to throw a gauntlet at India’s avowed fiscal discipline targets through huge unproductive cash rewards, the coming few months could well reveal whether the ‘lucky Indian’ was rewarded enough to be weaned off his love for cash. 

___________