In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, August 31, 2017

11936 - THE AADHAAR GAME - Pune Mirror



Pune Mirror | Updated: Aug 31, 2017, 02.30 AM IST

By: Shanta Gokhale

How the government worked on breaking resistance

Is Aadhaar meant for identity or identification? 
Is it voluntary or mandatory?

Many citizens of this country must have their own Aadhaar card stories to tell. I heard a few in the queues in which I stood even as the nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court was in the process of deciding its future, depending on whether it held privacy to be a fundamental right or not. Its clear-eyed ruling with multiple progressive applications was greeted by bold headlines and hosannas. But, ignominiously for me, my Aadhaar story had ended the day before.

My resistance to Aadhaar was prompted by the State speaking in two tongues. While one tongue said Aadhaar was voluntary, the other, using agencies like banks, mobile phone providers and the income-tax department, was saying it was mandatory. 
I suspected the State’s motives. Dr Usha Ramanathan, in her spirited Sunday interview in Mumbai Mirror, confirmed the suspicion. Calling a spade a spade, she faulted the State for its two-facedness. She said its strategy was coercion, not compulsion; and Aadhaar was not a document for identity but for identification. She also said we had forgotten the need for civil disobedience in the face of a bad law and become “an obedient and compliant population.” True. To our shame, the present government with its hordes has succeeded in making us feel that obedience to its every diktat is patriotism. 

A close relation, an enthusiastic member of the Obedience & Compulsion brigade, demanded angrily why I should put myself above the millions who had got Aadhaars as soon as the government had said, go get. Sakshi Maharaj too asked, equally angrily, “Who is right? Crores of people who see god in Ram Rahim or that girl who filed a complaint?” 
In our majoritarian State, right and wrong is a question of numbers. Fortunately, the judiciary supports the individual. Like “that girl”.

With all that, my Aadhaar-resistance crumbled as the last date for filing incometax returns approached. Filing returns is an annual must, however meagre my income. My CA said she couldn’t file them without an Aadhaar number. I said defiantly, file them all the same. What will the State do? Jail me for being law-abiding? She sighed. Returns could only be filed online and the programme automatically blocked those that were not linked to Aadhaar. I raved and ranted, but yielded. Technology, in the aid of a coercive State, brought me to my knees. So began five days of frustration, days I could have spent watching dance or hearing music or seeing a play or attending a talk. Here’s an account of how they went, in point form.

Day One: Identify and visit nearest Aadhaar centre. Centre closed.

Day Two: Hunt for a centre that is open. Find one in Lower Parel, Mumbai. Nobody answers the phone. Go personally. It is working. “Come tomorrow. Two of our machines are down today.”

Day Three: Go to centre at previous day’s time. “This is the wrong time. Come between eight and nine in the morning.”

Day Four: Arrive at eight. “Time is right. But we only give 100 tokens. Quota finished.” But a kind spirit whispers, “Senior citizens can come in the afternoon. Ask them.” Yes, it’s true.

Day Five: Afternoon. Am given a form to fill. Try to go indoors to sit down and fill it. Stopped by sentry. “Stand in the queue.” Fill the form standing? Allowed in ungraciously. Token numbers are being called out. They stop at 196. I am 215. The clock creeps to 5.30 pm. Sentry enters. “Go to 1st floor, but don’t say I sent you”

We are thieves. We sneak in. There’s a melee in the narrow space upstairs. The hard-worked men and women in the cubicles are restless. It is nearly pack-up time. People begin to push. I don’t know how to push. Never done it before. Gradually, the crowd clears. I face a grumbling woman. I am fingerprinted like a criminal. I have finally enrolled for Aadhaar. I walk out feeling deeply humiliated. The State has arranged to make me feel that way.

On Sunday, the Maharashtra Government’s feel-free-to-make-noise sop kicks in. A bunch of Ganapati bhakts has engaged eight booming drums and one raucous synthesiser to provide non-stop music for them to dance to. Their bhaktifilled dance hall is the road before our house. The mayhem lasts for an hour. Ganapati Bappa Morya!

The silver lining to the week is PV Sindhu’s incredible match against Japan’s Nozomi Okuhara. Sindhu shines. Momentarily, we forget our Ram Rahims, Sakshi Maharajs and citizen-unfriendly governments. We are proud.

♦ Liked/hated her column? Write to Shanta Gokhale at punemirror.feedback@gmail.com