In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, January 11, 2018

12680 - Aadhaar linking is voluntary, it's not mandatory to avail services: Experts - Business Standard


There is no penal consequence for people who don't want to link Aadhaar, says an activist

Last Updated at January 10, 2018 11:32 IST

The previous deadline was Jul 31 but was extended to Aug 31 and later to Dec 31, 2017

Despite government extending the deadline for mandatory linking Aadhaar to avail benefits of various welfare schemes to March 31, there are companies that are insisting on giving Aadhaar details to avail numerous services.

Last week there were media reports that Cigna TTK Health Insurance had apparently told the family of a policyholder that they could not avail cashless treatment as she did not have an Aadhaar card. Sandeep Patel, MD & CEO at Cigna TTK Health Insurance said, “The customer’s wife was admitted to Chennai’s Fortis Hospital. The pre-authorization was approved immediately by Cigna TTK Health Insurance. As part of the process, three major documents were requested, hospital bills, diagnostic reports and Aadhaar / PAN and Form 60. Subsequently, the customer informed the third party administrator (TPA) that she did not have an Aadhaar card and the same was relayed to Cigna TTK Health Insurance. As you would know, there are different levels of approval when a cashless claim is requested, we, at Cigna TTK Health Insurance, followed the required approval processes and her claim was accepted and approved within 10 minutes.”

ALSO READ





However, activists and lawyers say there is no compulsion to submit Aadhaar for availing services. “One should understand that order by Supreme Court doesn’t say that Aadhaar is mandatory. It’s been consistently told by the Supreme Court since 2013 that Aadhaar is voluntary and not mandatory. Companies who are asking for compulsory Aadhaar are attempting to outwit the Supreme Court order through different procedures.

They are counting on the digital ignorance of the SC judges,” said Gopal Krishna, Convener of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties (CFCL).

The government has extended to March 31 the deadline for mandatory linking of Aadhaar to avail the benefits of various welfare schemes. That includes many numerous schemes including free cooking gas (LPG) to poor women, kerosene and fertilizer subsidy and targeted public distribution system (PDS). Even financial products like insurance, mutual funds, small saving schemes and banks account among others categories where investors/policyholders need to link their Aadhaar with their investments. Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to a resident of India.

There are people who think that data is the next big thing and companies want to cash on this to do more business. “Some companies see an opportunity in the present climate to collect data; and, if data is indeed the new oil, that could mean business and profits. For some others, the government's threat that not collecting unique identity number (UID) numbers will be seen as disobedience of government expectations is enough. Many others are blindly doing what seems to be the order of the day. The one thing that is clear is that it is the government, and not the law, that seems to mater with the companies,” said Usha Ramanathan independent law researcher.

In 2013, the court first said no one should be denied any service because someone does not have a UID. In August 2015, the court directed that the UID cannot be used anywhere other than in PDS and LPG distribution, and even there it must be voluntary. In October 2015, the court allowed its extension to four more areas of application - NREGA, social security pension, provident fund and Jan Dhan Yojana.

Activists categorically say extension given by the government is for the people who have Aadhaar and want to link it with the services. It doesn’t apply to people who don’t have an Aadhaar and there is no penal consequence for people who don’t want to link Aadhaar.

First Published: Wed, January 10 2018. 11:20 IST