In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

12772 - Voter ID-Aadhaar linking to resume after SC gives nod: CEC - The Hindu



NEW DELHI , JANUARY 23, 2018 21:05 IST

The newly-appointed Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), O.P. Rawat, on Tuesday said the electoral body would resume the exercise of linking voter identity cards to Aadhaar database when the Supreme Court gives its nod.
“About 38 crore Voter IDs are already linked to Aadhaar. The process will be resumed once the Supreme Court gives its nod,” Mr. Rawat told The Hindu, soon after he took charge as the CEC. The Commission’s request to permit the linking is pending before the Supreme Court.
The EC had initiated the exercise in February 2015, but it was suspended later that year after the Court held that Aadhaar could be used for only PDS and LPG distribution schemes.
‘Examining electoral bond scheme’
On electoral bonds, Mr. Rawat said the Commission had communicated its concerns to the government in 2015. “We received the notification about 10 days ago. Our Secretariat is examining its import vis-à-vis our suggestions,” he said.
The Secretariat’s findings would be before the Commission in a couple of days, after which the electoral body will finalise its views and, if necessary, communicate them to the government.
‘AAP didn’t respond to EC notices’
Responding to Aam Aadmi Party’s allegation that its 20 MLAs, who have been disqualified on office-of-profit charge, were not given opportunity to present their case, Mr. Rawat said two notices were issued to them.
“We had issued two comprehensive notices to them, asking for whatever submissions they wanted to make. But, they did not respond in the context of the notices,” he said.
As for the timing of recommendation, the CEC said it was determined by the flow of events. Three Commissioners, including the then CEC Nasim Zaidi and Election Commissioners A.K. Joti and Mr. Rawat, had heard the case.
After Dr. Zaidi retired, his successor Mr. Joti and Mr. Rawat heard the matter. Then Mr. Joti also retired, leaving Mr. Rawat alone in the Bench. The situation warranted that either a decision had to be taken or the case would have to be heard afresh. It had already taken almost two years, he said.

EC to be active in social media
Asserting that recent allegations by political parties had not dented the Commission’s image, Mr. Rawat said to counter “information asymmetry” that distorted perceptions in different quarters, it was EC’s duty to ensure comprehensive information dissemination among all stakeholders.
On Wednesday, the EC is launching a monitoring cell that will keep a close watch on “whatever is propagated through social media” and respond accordingly to ensure that “it is healthy for our electorate” by making suggestions for improving the contents. “You will find our presence in the social media,” he said.
Stating that there was no trust deficit for the EC among political parties, Mr. Rawat said: “Politics is the art of possible and they work on those lines. The Commission has to get 360-degree information on every issue and decide objectively.”
‘EVM controversy yet to die down’
Conceding that EVM controversy had not died down completely, the CEC said the Commission had to work harder to ensure more credibility for the machines among the electorate.
Mr. Rawat, however, said that all kinds of criticism were welcome as they gave an opportunity for further reforms. He said the Commission had never contemplated punitive action against adverse remarks. The EC had earlier sought contempt power to address baseless allegations, but the government refused.
“Let the things unfold…as of today, we are not asking for contempt power,” he said.
The CEC said a decision on extending or universalising the pilot project on matching of VVPAT slips with results at one random polling station in each constituency would be taken on the findings during the recent Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh elections and by-polls, which were yet to be arrived at.
On simultaneous elections, Mr. Rawat said as earlier suggested by the EC, the related laws had to be amended and logistical support provided for.

Post a Comment
Receive the best of The Hindu delivered to your inbox everyday!