In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, January 12, 2018

12720 - Aadhaar website has basic security flaws, blogs Aussie expert - TNN



TNN | Jan 12, 2018, 04:29 IST

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Hunt clarified he wasn’t against the idea of Aadhaar, but said the agency’s “attitude of ‘there cannot possibly be a security problem’ is reckless and needs redressing.”
  • He also found the website vulnerable to what are called “man in the middle” or MitM attacks.

NEW DELHI: Australian information security expert Troy Hunt on Thursday pointed out a bunch of basic security flaws with the Aadhaar website uidai.gov.in. These included a vulnerability to "man in the middle attacks," outdated security certificates, and inadequate encryption of data. 

In a blog post titled "Is India's Aadhaar System Really 'Hack-Proof'? Assessing a Publicly Observable Security Posture," Hunt clarified that he wasn't against the idea of Aadhaar, but he said the agency's "attitude of 'there cannot possibly be a security problem' is reckless and needs redressing." 

On analysing the website, Hunt found that it blocked certain users based on their geographical location (a feature known as geo-blocking). Hunt says this can keep basic unauthorised automated attacks out but was a weak measure that was "easily circumvented." He also found the website vulnerable to what are called "man in the middle" or MitM attacks. These attacks typically involve a hacker taking advantage of the gaps in security when data travels from an access point to the website server. Another security concern Hunt flagged was the security certificate being used by the Aadhaar website. The one currently in use is due to expire for those using the Chrome browser in March this year. 

"Aadhaar is complex and it will have flaws just like any other complex software product does. Some of them may be quite serious and they must be treated as such. That will require an open and receptive attitude from the government and above all, acknowledgment that Aadhaar is not 'hack-proof,'" Hunt wrote, exhorting the Indian government to "move the needle in the right direction" in securing Aadhaar while appreciating the UIDAI's move to introduce virtual tokens. 

Hunt is a regional director with Microsoft and regularly holds workshops and hosts courses on information security. He is also the person behind the popular website haveibeenpwned.com where users can key in their email address to see if it has been compromised. 

On why he chose to analyse the website rather than testing the integrity of the database, Hunt said, "It's the first result on a Google search and time and time again, it's promoted as the site people should go to before doing anything else Aadhaar related" and that an "entry point must be as secure as possible or else everything else behind there gets put at risk."

Citing various news reports from Indian news organisations where UIDAI officials have been quoted as saying that Aadhaar data cannot be breached, Hunt pointed out that every system has some vulnerability or the other and is open to attacks or breaches. He pointed to the sophisticated Stuxnet attack on the Natanz nuclear facility in Iran, affecting the country's highly secure uranium enriching centrifuges. He said that information security cannot be seen in purely binary terms. "It's not 'secure' versus 'insecure', 'safe' versus 'unsafe', rather it is a spectrum of controls that all contribute to an overall security posture. There is no 'fully', there is no 'completely'; every system - every single one - has weak points and a sufficiently well-equipped and determined adversary will find them," Hunt wrote in his blog post. 

TOP COMMENT
Far more knowledgeable and mature comments regarding Aadhaar security than the outburst by NIlekani. He has pointed out that security can be breached even in places like the Pentagon  or Iran , so It can happen here too. WE just have to keep improving and not remain in denial.
nityas2005 NItyananda

While Hunt's blog came in for rapid circulation online, a Twitter user by the screen name Elliot Alderson and handle @fs0c131y pointed out flaws with the mAadhaar mobile app. He posted a proof of concept on the website Github demonstrating the weakness of the passwords protecting the databases.

Both these interventions come at the back of a recent investigative report from The Tribune showing how access to the complete Aadhaar database could be bought for a pittance of Rs 500. Following the report last week, an FIR was filed in the case mentioning the newspaper, the reporter and the editor.