In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

1205 - Rlys want to latch on to UIDAI wagon-Source Business Standard

Sudheer Pal Singh / New Delhi April 5, 2011, 0:50 IST
Financial problems have forced Indian Railways to look at restricting subsidy and concessions to the deserving. It is now looking at a solution from the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) for ensuring accurate identification of the beneficiaries of its low-cost services.

The railways have already held a meeting with UIDAI Chairman Nandan Nilekani. The plan is to link the UIDAI’s database to the ticketing system of railways. “We have already had one meeting with Nilekani. Once this (linking) is done, we will be able to ensure that people who are not beneficiaries of discount services for poor, like the Izzat scheme, are not benefited by low fares,” said a senior official from the railway ministry who did not want to be named. He, however, declined to share details, as the proposal is still at preliminary stages.

The issue of identification in the railway ticketing system assumes importance due to the huge differential in rates. Lower class fares are typically between 12 and 14 times less than the fares in upper class services like AC first class.
The last Railway Fare and Freight Committee, which gave its recommendations as far back as 1993, had advocated a highest-to-lowest passenger fare ratio of 9.6.

Under the Izzat scheme, introduced in 2009-10, uniformly priced Monthly Season Tickets (MSTs) worth Rs 25 are issued for a distance up to 100 km to a person whose monthly income does not exceed Rs 1,500. An Izzat MST is issued on production of an income certificate from a district magistrate or an area MP, or after a Union minister or Rajya Sabha MP recommends it to the Divisional Railway Manager.

Though the aim is to provide inexpensive travel option to people working in the unorganised sector, the response has been somewhat subdued, owing to the huge paperwork involved.

“Differential tariff structure will become very simple and easy once we have these UIDs. This will give the railways some sort of a database linked to the national database. So, when a person from a below poverty line (BPL) identity avails of railway travel, and swipes his card, the tariff structure will be determined through his identity. Today, we are not able to do that because identification of people is an issue,” said another official.

Experts believe that implementing the proposal for linking UIDs to the ticketing system might not be easy. “Conceptually, this is a major intervention. But any pro-poor government must ensure that people who are slightly better economically than the BPL category and are employed in the unorganised sectors must also be benefitted. This will not be easy. Also, avoiding misuse of ID cards for availing of season tickets will be difficult and will require additional spending,” said R Sivadasan, former railway financial commissioner.

The railways provide season tickets to commuters from economically weaker sections, allowing them to commute any number of times in a month while paying for only 15 days travel.