In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, February 3, 2013

2898 - Be patient in implementing food security, cash transfer: Pawar to Congress




Instead calls for a pragmatic approach considering present economic conditions
Sanjay Jog / Mumbai Dec 28, 2012, 18:51 IST

The Nationalist Congress Party, a junior partner in the Congress led United Progressive Alliance, on Friday toughened its stand on issues relating to food security and Aadhar based cash transfer schemes. NCP asked its big brother, the Congress party not to be in a haste in making these decisions. He asked them to be pragmatic. Union agriculture minister and NCP chief Sharad Pawar at the outset said his party has extended its support to food security bill and Aadhar based cash transfer scheme but it was of the firm view that there decisions should not taken in an hurry.

Earlier, Pawar has supported FDI in multi brand retail during the vote in the parliament. However, he has asked its co-partner Congress in Maharashtra to hold coordination meeting before its launch in the state. By raising objection at the state level, Pawar has indicated that his party is at the forefront to safeguard the interests of the farmers, mathadi workers in particular.

Pawar, who inaugurated NCP state units' state of the art office in south Mumbai, told Business Standard "I during my speech at the National Development Council has put on record my position on the implementation of food security. The decisions in this regard needs to be taken after taking into account the present economic conditions wherein there are rising constraints on carrying out expenditure on various schemes due to falling revenue mobilization.  Under the food security programme nearly 68 per cent of the India's population are proposed to get wheat at Rs 2 per kg against the current procurement cost of Rs 18 per kg. The farmers will find it difficult to sell his marketable surplus in such a situation and therefore any decision in this regard should be pragmatic in its nature." Pawar warned that if the farmers fail to get right price for his marketable surplus then he may shift to other crop which may in turn adversely impact the wheat production in future. He also added that if wheat production falls the country would be forced to import it.

Pawar  said those living below poverty line (BPL) are getting monthly 35 kg of food grains at Rs 2 per kg. He referred to the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's statement at his speech at the National Development Council that there has been 2 per cent fall BPL families in the country. "If the number of BPL families is reducing why the government is increasing subsidies. Food grains at a concessional rate can be offered to families from dalit, minorities and tribal instead of providing to all BPL families," he noted.

As far as cash transfer scheme is concerned, Pawar said his party is of the view that the central government needs to reconsider the disbursement of cash to the poor based on Aadhar cards. "NCP's women representatives in particular at the recent rally fear that if cash is disbursed there is a possibility that men may use it for drinking alcohol. We will appeal the central government and Congress to take into consideration various objections to the direct cash transfer scheme," he noted.

Meanwhile, Pawar exhorted party members to strive to improve its tally in parliamentary and Maharashtra state assembly elections slated for 2014. However, he clarified that NCP was not keen to claim more seats from its ally Congress party but was quite keen to improve its striking rate by winning more seats. "During 2009 elections, NCP, which contested elections in an alliance with Congress, won 62 seats from 114 seats alloted to it. Efforts should be done to win 100 seats as expressed by several leaders," he added.

Pawar indicated that despite neglect and humiliation from the Congress party his party was quite keen to continue its alliance in 2014 to keep the communal forces at bay. However, state party chief Madhukar Pichad and NCP leader Praful Patel in their speeches warned that NCP would not tolerate Congress party's rigid policies in future but make all efforts to become number one party in Maharashtra. Pichad went a step further and said the party should prepare itself to fight alone ensuing elections.