In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, February 16, 2013

3044 - Direct Cash Transfer: Who Does It Benefit? By S.G.Vombatkere - Counter Currents


14 February, 2013
Countercurrents.org

Direct Cash Transfer (DCT) of subsidy to domestic LPG consumers starts on February 15, 2013, when LPG agencies will supply LPG refills on up-front cash payment of the full (unsubsidized) cost of the refill. The subsidy amount will be credited to the consumer's bank account based on the consumer's UID-Aadhaar number provided to the LPG agency and the bank. DCT is enabled by implementing the IT regime, centred on the UID-Aadhaar Project.

The main problem with DCT is that low-income, hand-to-mouth people, who have difficulty finding ready cash even for the subsidized cost, cannot find the cash to pay the unsubsidized cost up-front on delivery of the LPG cylinder, unless they obtain a loan from some source. When the cost of Rs.950 per cylinder is a whopping 10-20% of their monthly income, their source of ready cash is their employer or the local moneylender or the slum lord, all of whom extract extra work or heavy interest or some other liability from them. Thus the DCT scheme does them little if any good. On the contrary, having to make multiple trips to the bank to verify subsidy credit, withdraw the amount and repay the loan, means time away from work that they can ill-afford [Note 1].
Hitherto, when consumers paid only the subsidized cost on delivery, the oil marketting corporations (OMCs) accounted for the subsidy in their books. But with the introduction of DCT, the cash subsidy passes through the banking system. The hand-to-mouth segment which had no use for banks because they had no money to invest (and banks had no use for them for the same reason) is now sucked into the banking system by the DCT scheme.

Kalpana Pathak reporting from Mumbai, “Tracking your subsidized cylinder” in Business Standard, September 19, 2012, puts the total number of domestic LPG connections at 144 million in 2012, of which 41% used six or less cylinders per year. Assuming that it is this 41% segment that is low-income and that the subsidy per cylinder is Rs.500, the total subsidy that they would utilize would be Rs.17,700 crores (41% of 144 million x 500 x 6). Thus annually, Rs.17,700 crores per year of “fresh” DCT money will circulate through banks. DCT also ensures that the subsidy provided to the other 59% segment, which was already within the banking system, circulates through banks. Thus roughly, a total cash injection of Rs.4,32,000 crores (144 million x 500 x 6) into the banking system is due to DCT for LPG subsidy.

The DCT scheme, when expanded into other areas like MGNREGA, will bring really enormous numbers of mini-micro “investors” operating zero-balance accounts opened on the strength of their (compulsory) Aadhaar enrolment, into the banking system. The loss borne by them in terms of time and cost of travel to operate their bank accounts is obviously not a factor in the DCT system.
DCT brings enormous funds into the banking system, as the “contribution” of the poor to enhance government's liquidity. Increased liquidity can provide funds for infrastructure projects, and loans to industrial and business corporations which will win contracts in those projects. However, infrastructure projects (mines, irrigation projects, hydel projects, thermal and nuclear power plants, factories, roads, power transmission lines, harbours, airports, etc) are increasingly at the cost of land and livelihood of the very poor, even of those within the DCT scheme. The DCT scheme is the logical outcome of the UID-Aadhaar project, purportedly designed to ensure that government benefits reach the poor. The reality is that this kind of “inclusion” makes use of the poor without really empowering them.

NOTES

Note 1. For an illiterate, a visit to the bank to withdraw a small sum (the subsidy) using the withdrawal slip is humiliating and time-consuming. It would take at least 30 minutes at the bank. Adding at least 120 minutes travel time from work place to the bank and back in urban areas, the absence from work is around 3 hours, not accounting for the fatigue that even well-heeled (“valued”) bank customers experience. In suburban and rural areas that have poor public transportation, the time taken may be half a day. The cost of travel (bus or local train) is an additional burden. Borrowing and repaying the short-term loan taken for the LPG up-front payment with usurious interest, is yet another matter that only one who has lived those regular experiences will understand, but it cannot be dismissed as hypothetical.

Major General S.G. Vombatkere retired as the Additional Director General, Discipline & Vigilance in Army HQ, New Delhi. The President of India awarded him the Visishta Seva Medal in 1993 for distinguished service rendered over 5 years in Ladakh. He holds a PhD degree in Structural Dynamics from IIT, Madras. He is Adjunct Associate Professor of the University of Iowa, USA, and is a member of NAPM and PUCL. He writes on strategic and development-related issues. E-mail: sg9kere@live.com