In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 4, 2013

2930 - Direct cash transfer not possible in West Bengal, says minister




The state government recently told the Centre with only 19% of West Bengal's population being covered by the Aadhaar card

Namrata Acharya / New Delhi Jan 11, 2013, 01:09 IST

The Union government has set ambitious plans for its direct cash transfer scheme, but West Bengal is in no mood to implement it immediately.

The state government recently told the Centre with only 19 per cent of West Bengal’s population being covered by the Aadhaar card, or unique identification numbers, so far, it would take at least two years before the scheme could be implemented in the state.

“We feel direct transfer of benefits will lead to unemployment. Moreover, only 19 per cent of West Bengal is currently covered by the Aadhaar card. The central government is taking no initiative to increase the penetration. It will be difficult to implement the scheme over the next two-to-three years. We are always opposed to the scheme,” said Jyotipriya Mullick, minister for food and supplies, West Bengal.
Ironically, even if West Bengal is opposed to direct subsidy transfer, the state has been following the footsteps of the Central government in payment against paddy procurement in the state. When it came into power in 2011, the Trinamool Congress had abolished the system of payment to farmers through rice mills for their produce, as prevalent in the earlier Left Front regime. The state started facilitating payment directly to the farmers by cheque. However, with a large number of farmers not having bank accounts and long delays in payments, there have been complaints about the modalities of payment.

Under the direct benefit transfer scheme, the government will transfer cash benefits like scholarships, pensions, and MGNREGS (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme) wages directly to the bank or post office accounts of identified beneficiaries, based on the unique identification number. The National Committee on Direct Cash Transfers has decided the scheme would be rolled out in 43 districts by March 1. The purpose of the scheme is to ensure that benefits go to individual’s bank accounts electronically, cutting down delays and diversions.

So far, the scheme has been rolled out in Karnataka, Maharashtra, Delhi, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab and the Union Territories of Puducherry, Chandigarh and Daman and Diu. Once the programme has stabilised in 43 districts, the government had planned to roll it out in phases in other parts of the country over 2013.

Apart from the Aadhaar card, streamlining the banking system has also been an uphill task for implementation of the direct subsidy transfer scheme. While initially beneficiaries will be able to withdraw cash from their own bank branches or ATMs (automated teller machines) or business correspondents (BCs).

The government plans to introduce the system of micro-ATMs and multiple BCs, with full inter-operability, to streamline the banking system.