In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 4, 2013

2969 - UPA : Union Cabinet of Ignorance!



Last updated on: January 31, 2013 23:50 IST

Believe it or not, Prime minister Manmohan Singh’s Cabinet is unable to arrive at consensus on the exact identity of AADHAAR -- Unique Identification Number (UID).

Union Finance Minister P Chidambaram thinks it’s “just a number”. He is correct. But Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar, Railway Minister Pawan Bansal and many other ministers say, “It’s a card.”

The Union Cabinet that met on Thursday, reportedly, displayed a sensational lack of knowledge about their own ideas, plans and its execution. The question was, probably, worth Rs 5,500 crore.

When the Cabinet met on the issue of harmonising the AADHAAR and National Population Register’s exercise and the need for a Resident Identity Card, an unbelievable situation arose.

The country’s most powerful people, sitting on both sides of Dr Singh, on the high table of power, could not decide if AADHAAR is a card or merely a number and as a result they could not approve the budget needed to take the issue further.

During the debate, on the pros and cons of the resident ID card in the Cabinet, even Dr Singh was moved to ask, "Do we really need it?" So much confusion arose among the mighty men that the Union Cabinet had to send the issue to a Group of Ministers to sort it out.

It was surprising for many present to see that the cerebral political entity and even a trained lawyer such as Chidambaram didn’t know that many of his colleagues have gone through the biometrics exercise and got a card that they call the Aadhaar. He was, reportedly, taken by surprise when so many ministers told him that they had gotten “the card”.

He insisted that AADHAAR is merely a number and not an ID card, says a source privy to the event.

At one point, Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh butted in to say that there was no need of a ‘card’ for the identity of a resident of India because citizens can get and store the ‘identify number’ on their mobiles.

Veerappa Moily , the man of wisdom and more, got provoked. He taunted Jairam that he (Moily) is not able to handle his own mobile phone and expects villagers to use mobile phones to show their identification number. Jairam meekly quoted the millions of mobile connections that are in use in India.

The wise men of India are confused because the brand name of the Unique Identification Number project is Aadhaar. At same time the government has initiated the creation of  the National Population Register by collecting specific information from all residents in the country during the house listing and housing census phase of Census 2011 from April 2010 to September 2010, according to the NPR’s website.

NPR data comes under the Union home ministry and AADHHAR is handled by a specially created body under the Planning Commission in 2009. It is headed by Infosys  co-founder Nandan Nilkeni.

The turf war going on between the NPR and AADHHAR is compounding confusion at the highest level and even among a billion plus Indians.

Gopalkrishna, member of Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties, who gave testimony before the parliamentary standing committee on finance that rejected the UID Bill, says, “It’s not surprising that Cabinet ministers are confused. The Aadhaar advertisement in Imphal has shown that it is a card, although, it is not. The UID Authority of India has been misleading citizens.”

He says, "Chidambaram is right in this case. What appears as a card is deceptive because only the 12-digit number, which printed on the so-called card, is of relevance. It is this 12-digit number which is part of a central database of UID/Aadhaar that acts an identifier, and not as an identity card.