In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

3273 - A tale of missing voters and aadhaar cards




HANSA VENKATESWARAN


SILENCE OF THE DELETED... Bangalore residents who went 'missing' from the voters' list in 2009..


A total of 3,32,131 people in Bangalore have been denied the right to vote in the upcoming Assembly elections.

It seems they primarily belong to the minority communities and economically weaker sections.

If they want to re-enlist online, they will have to pay Rs 10 each. If all the unlisted voters do this, it will amount to a total of Rs. 33.2 lakh paid by the ‘ghost’ electorate to the Government.

When asked if the amount will be written off by the Government, Chief Electoral Officer Anil Kumar Jha refused to comment.

Some of the constituencies where the number of deletions of names are more than 20,000 include Gandhinagar , Chickpet, Sarvagnanagar, Vijaynagar, Basavanagudi, Padmanabhanagar and BTM Layout.

Former mayor P.R. Ramesh sparked off anger when he revealed that one constituency, Chickpet, had 42,000 fewer voters. He had acquired data on all the constituencies via a Right to Information (RTI) request. Following this, the Election Commission initiated an investigation.

S.M. Ayub, president of the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC), said: “About 15,000 minorities’ names out of a total of 29,000 were deleted from the electoral roll in my constituency alone this year. We filed a complaint with the Election Commission and now we are on a door-to-door campaign to tell people that they will be asked to register themselves for voter IDs.”

Individuals wanting to make changes in the details in their cards need apply online. They will have to visit an eSeva centre where they will have to pay a nominal fee of Rs 10. While the rest of the job is done online, all the individual has to do is go and collect the ID.

However, those who do not have easy access to Internet will have to spend more as they not only have to get the forms from the nearest office but also pay for postal services.

Abdul Karim, 53, a bedding merchant at Chickpet, said: “Currently, I do not have a voter ID card. Every time the Government changes, they bring new laws. I do not know why my name is not there in the electoral list this year. I received my aadhaar card, my name got deleted.”

When they were asked why the names had been deleted, individuals working at the poll booths said the details in the cards were either changed or not provided properly or did not exist and so they were asked to remove their names.

Afzal, 25, a gas mechanic at Kalasipalaya, said: “How can they remove the name from the electoral list? I do not understand why they tell that us that it is mandatory to have the aadhaar card for us to vote. They say that as we don’t have the aadhaar cards, our names have been deleted from the list.”

(Hansa is a student of the Indian Institute of Journalism and New Media, Bangalore.)

(This article was published on April 28, 2013)