In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

3384 - Lack of Aadhaar ID should not become alibi of exclusion: Ramesh

Lack of Aadhaar ID should not become alibi of exclusion: Ramesh
Zee News

New Delhi: Amid concerns that sticking to Aadhaar criteria could deprive many people especially in remote areas of benefits of UPA's ambitious cash transfer scheme, Union Minster Jairam Ramesh on Friday cautioned against a situation when Aadhaar becomes "an instrument of exclusion".

"Unfortunately many of the beneficiaries of government programmes are outside the network of Aadhaar numbers' network. So you find that in a very large number of the districts... The Aadhaar coverage is much much below the critical threshold of 75 to 80 percent. That really has to be seen," Ramesh said addressing a conference on cash transfer schemes here.

He said that there is a need to be "very very careful" to ensure that "lack of a Aadhaar number does not become an alibi of exclusion of the beneficiary".

"We do not want to be in a situation, when Aadhaar becomes an instrument of exclusion. That if you do not have the Aadhaar number, you will not get the benefits. We do not want this situation and this situation is very probable. One should never discount the probability of a local level functionary saying that since you do not have a Aadhaar number, you are not eligible," he said.

There have been reports that Centre may bypass Aadhaar to accomplish the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) before the scheme is launched on July 1.

The Union Minster also rued that the public sector banks are not responding adequately to the Banking Correspondents (BCs) model, which is absolutely critical for delivering benefits directly into the hands of beneficiaries.

"Private banks have been far more innovative than public banks regarding the use of BCs. To get public sector banks in the framework of BCs has been a challenge. Banks are simply not on board as far as this crucial thing of BCs is concerned," Ramesh said.

The minister also favoured relying more on post offices to reach out to people in the remote tribal areas than banks, widening and strengthening the network of BCs to include self help groups, Asha workers and other such agencies and moving away from BPL/APL issue while deciding on beneficiaries.

"We focus too much on banks, when we talk of financial inclusions. In tribal are rural areas, post offices are much more effective. There is a need to take the post office thing much more seriously. Access to post offices is far more easier than banks," Ramesh said at the conference, where concerns were raised on the role of banks with some dubbing them as a big obstacle.

As representatives from UNICEF and SEWA Bharat hailed the outcome of their pilot project of giving additional cash income to the stakeholders, Ramesh had a word of caution saying he had seen many such "magic bullets" and advocated the need for a more comprehensive survey to validate the points.

He, however, hailed the survey for "dispelling some of the myths" associated with unconditional transfer of cash to beneficiaries.

Self Employed Women Association (SEWA) having membership of around 17 lakh entered into a partnership with UNICEF to pilot an unconditional cash transfer (UCT), or basic income grant experiment in rural areas of Madhya Pradesh.

The study done in these rural areas covering 20 villages revealed that recipients of UCT were significantly more likely to contribute to their dwellings.

Holding that an interoperable open architecture of banking correspondents is one of the pillars of the "giant exercise" of DBT, the minister said that change in the BC model is absolutely critical for delivering benefits directly into the hands of beneficiaries.

The purpose of Direct Benefits Transfer is to ensure that benefits go to individuals' bank accounts electronically, minimising those involved in fund flow thereby reducing delay in payment as well as curbing pilferage and duplication.

Ramesh said that the net of BCs should be widened to include SHGs, Asha workers and other such agencies. "We have to get the BC network right. That is the fundamental flaw in our system," Ramesh said.

On apprehensions about exclusion of the real needy persons from the list of beneficiaries, the minister said that the problem will be solved "only when we clean up the BPL list".

"The answer to inclusion or exclusion is to move away from BPL/APL issue. That is the direction in which we are headed. In the last years in two major government programmes, we have actually abandoned the BPL as a criteria for reaching the benefits.

"First, in the sanitation programme in the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan and now as part of National Rural Livelihood Mission. We have removed it and moved towards a system of participatory identification of the poor," the minister said.

He noted that there are only three major government programmes which are now BPL centric food subsidy-- Indira Awas Yojana and Pensions.

"Even out of these three, I have already moved proposals to make pension universal with exclusion criteria to get away from this controversial BPL controversy.

"About Indira Awas Yojana we have already announced that from next year 2014, we would not go by the BPL criteria but we will go by the houselessness data collected through the socio-economic caste census," he said.

PTI

Lack of Aadhaar ID should not become an alibi for exclusion: Jairam

The Hindu

GIRIJA SHIVAKUMAR

With increasing concern over the establishment of a centralised database such as the Unique Identification (UID) that may deny several people, especially in remote areas, the benefits of the cash transfer scheme, Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh cautioned against a situation where Aadhaar could become ‘an instrument of exclusion.’

“Unfortunately, many of the beneficiaries of government programmes are outside the network of Aadhaar numbers. So you find that in a very large number of districts... the Aadhaar coverage is much, much below the critical threshold of 75 to 80 per cent. That really has to be seen,” Mr. Ramesh said at a conference on unconditional cash transfers (UCT) organised by United Nations Children’s Fund (Unicef) on Friday.

Mr. Ramesh noted that there was a definite need to be ‘very, very careful’ to ensure that the ‘lack of an Aadhaar number does not become an alibi for exclusion of the beneficiary.”

“We do not want to be in a situation when Aadhaar becomes an instrument of exclusion. That if you do not have the Aadhaar number, you will not get the benefits. We do not want this situation and this situation is very, very probable. One should never discount the probability of a local-level functionary saying that since you do not have an Aadhaar number, you are not eligible,” he said.

The Minister suggested moving away from the Below Poverty Line (BPL)/Above Poverty Line (APL) criteria while deciding beneficiaries. Further, he encouraged reliance on post offices instead of banks in order to reach out to those in remote tribal areas, as well as widening the network of BCs to include self-help groups, Asha workers, and other such agencies. The country now has a cash transfer system where banks and post offices are used to pay old-age pensions to poor people.

In order to target beneficiaries better and speed up transfer of benefits to eligible individuals, Mr. Ramesh noted that the problem would be solved “only when we clean up the BPL list.”

“The answer to inclusion or exclusion is to move away from the BPL/APL issue. That is the direction in which we are headed. In the last years in two major government programmes, we have actually abandoned the BPL as a criterion for providing benefits,” he said

Currently, there are only three significant government programmes that are now BPL-centric, including food subsidy, Indira Awas Yojana and Pensions.

“Even out of these three, I have already moved proposals to make pension universal with exclusion criteria to get away from this BPL controversy. About Indira Awas Yojana, we have already announced that from next year, we would not go by the BPL criteria, but we will go by the houseless-ness data collected through the socio-economic caste census.”





'Don't Want Aadhaar to Become Instrument of Exclusion'

Outlook

Amid concerns that sticking to Aadhaar criteria could deprive many people especially in remote areas of benefits of UPA's ambitious cash transfer scheme, Union Minster Jairam Ramesh today cautioned against a situation when Aadhaar becomes "an ...

See all stories on this topic »