In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, January 10, 2014

4982 - What's the point of Aadhaar if one can't vote?- Governance Now

ANKITA LAHIRI | NOVEMBER 29 2013

Many residents of Sangam Vihar, a constituency in south Delhi with migrants from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh in majority, will not be able to exercise their franchise in the Delhi assembly elections. They do not have voter cards despite repeated attempts, as the authorities have told them the documents they furnish are not sufficient.

These are residents who have been based in the colony for nearly a decade, but are still struggling to get that that identity card that will enable them to vote.

This, when they have been able to get Aadhaar numbers for themselves without much problem. Establishing your identity, thus, can get you the welfare doles of the state but not the right to vote. Girish has been living in A-Block in Sangam Vihar for four years. The state has not been able to give him access to drinking water or quality health care services, and yet (or possibly because of that), he wants to vote and participate in the democratic process.

“I have applied for a voter’s card three-four times. The last time I went for it, they asked me to come back after a week. I leave all my work and go. I lose an entire day’s wages, but all I get to hear is: come back later.” He, however, did not face similar problems in getting his Aadhaar card earlier this year. But the documents he produced for that card – an electricity bill in his landlord’s name along with his lease agreement – have proved insufficient for the election card.

For the Sangam Vihar residents who have not been able to get a voter card, it is not even the question of producing the proof of residence; the problem, they allege, is of bribery.

For Radha, who runs a tea stall in D-Block, the matter ends at bribe. “I still do not have a voter’s card. Mera Aadhaar card toh ban gaya, lekin voter card nahi ban paaya. (My Aadhaar card got made but not my voter identity card). I even have a PAN card. Every time I go to the SDM’s (sub-divisional magistrate’s) office and produce the documents, they say these are not the right documents and throw them away in the bin. But people there say that give us Rs 1,000-2,000, and we will get you enrolled right away.”

Most of the residents in the area live on rent. The proof of resident they can produce is usually a utility bill in the name of the landlord, along with the lease agreement on the stamp paper. But the authorities do not consider the two as proofs. That leaves residents like Radha confused: if they served the purpose for Aadhaar, why can’t they be good for a voter’s card?
Of course, Aadhaar and the voter’s card have different purposes: one is to establish identity alone, and is meant for all ‘residents’ of India, whereas the other is meant for the adult citizens. 

Radha and others approached the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), perceived to be closer to the people and helpful in redressing their grievances, to get their names on electoral rolls. The party failed to help Radha, but managed to get Rita, a resident of B Block, and her family enrolled. “AAP got our voter’s card made. Our card was made on the basis of my husband’s bank account statement copy,” the resident says.

For the residents who are still struggling to get themselves enrolled, the process of getting a voter’s card is a long drawn one, where they have to devote entire days to chasing the authorities. As they face hardships and governance failures day in and day out, the voter card for them might be nothing more than an identity card and that purpose now is better served by the Aadhaar, which is easier to get too. No wonder many are content with that.


“What is the point of getting my voter card made, when I do not want to vote? I have my Aadhaar card. That is enough,” reasons Bharti of F-2 Block.