In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, January 20, 2014

5069 - Consumers and hoteliers suffer alike as LPG price gets unprecedented leap- TNN

V Devanathan, TNN Jan 4, 2014, 02.38PM IST

MADURAI: The recent hike in the price of non-subsidised liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) announced by government-owned oil companies has come as a rude shock for the residents and commercial establishments in the city. While the households are already reeling under the burden of the spiralling prices of essential commodities, the LPG price hike by Rs 217 for non-subsidised domestic cylinder, is seen by residents as adding insult to their injury.


On the other hand, owners of commercial establishments like hotels and restaurants opine that the unprecedented hike of Rs 385 per commercial cylinder has pushed them further to the corner. The hoteliers who are already suffering due to poor business in the past couple of months have however ruled out increasing the prices of food items. They feel that any increase in the price would keep the customers away from the restaurants.

At present, the price of unsubsidised domestic LPG cylinder in Madurai is sold at Rs 1,275 from Rs 1,058, while the commercial cylinder is sold at Rs 2,205 instead of Rs 1,820, sources from LPG agencies said.

K L Kumar, president of Madurai district hoteliers association said, "Although we are used to the LPG price hike, the latest one is unprecedented. While our business has slumped over the last couple of months we now have to bear this brunt. The price rise would further slash our profit margin."

R Srinivasan, secretary, Tamil Nadu Hotels Association said that they are not likely to increase the food prices all of a sudden.
Meanwhile, the most-affected would be those staying in the city because of their jobs. These people usually don't have any subsidised LPG connection and depend on the non-subsidised cylinders. Many of these people also say that registering for the Aadhaar card is not easy. The officials involved in the registration are do not respond positively They prefer to register only 50 families a day, which makes the process to be carried out at a snail's pace, they charge.

"I have not yet registered for the Aadhaar card. So every time I will have to spend more money hereafter. My desperate attempts to register for the Aadhaar card failed as the officials concerned are sending me back and asking to come the next day," rued S Rajaram, a resident of K K Nagar.
With the steep hike women in the city also feel that the cap of nine subsidised cylinders per year is insufficient and that it should be increased to at least 12.


R Santhamani, a resident of Jaihindpuram said, "We are a family of five. We require at least 12 cylinders per year, whereas we get only nine under the subsidised price. We have no other go but to cut the use of cylinders by hook or by crook."