In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, March 31, 2011

1198 - A scarlet letter - Source - Kindle Magazine by Sayan Bhattacharya

"It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself--anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face...; was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime..."
1984, George Orwell
It was September last year when both PM and shadow PM issued the first set of UID (Unique Identification) cards to some tribal women in Tembhli, a village in Maharastra, Since then the UPA government’s much vaunted Aadhar scheme, the elixir for the poor has been introduced in Mohali, Hyderabad and is soon to be launched in Jaipur, parts of Bihar and so on. A unique 16 digit identification number for each resident of India will ensure that from your daily ration to your education loan is just the swipe of a card away! So adieu red tape! Adieu corruption! After the NREGA, this scheme is being touted as the UPA’s next big ticket development project. With Nandan ‘Imagining India’ Nilekani (somewhere he said UID number, bank accounts and mobile phones should be the new slogan as bijli, sadak, pani is passé) at the helm, what could go wrong? But then a few niggling questions refuse to disappear.

Firstly there is hardly anything unique about UID. Riding high on 
the mass hysteria of the Kargil War, the NDA government had 
decided to compulsorily register all citizens into the NPR (National
Population Register) and issue them Multi-purpose National 
Identity Cards (MNIC) following security concerns expressed by the 
‘Kargil Review Committee’ in 2000. Effectively this would bring all 
under State surveillance for national security, boot out insurgents 
and immigrants, whatever that is supposed to mean. 

The MNIC is hardly any different from the UID numbers. Then 
the question is how did a measure that was initiated for security 
concerns get a development spin? Now along with the NPR and UID
put Chidambaram’s National Intelligence Grid into perspective. The 
Natgrid is meant to integrate 21 databases, including bank account 
details, phone calls, income tax, credit card transactions and so on, 
with Central and State government agencies. Though it has been 
rejected by the Cabinet Committeee on Security, the project 
continues to remain on the radar of the government. The 3 
complete the triumvirate for profiling citizens. So the question, 
when there is already a multiplicity of identity proofs like your 
voter id card, ration card, driving licence etc., what’s the 
need of a new centralized identity proof, becomes redundant.
One of the three companies that have bagged the contract 
(surprisingly in a record 3 months!) to register citizens 
under the UID scheme is L-1 Identity Solutions. 

What is important here is it provides identification technology to 
the US State Department and Homeland Security as well and is 
widely known to be connected to the CIA. It is also involved 
with the Chinese company Pixel Solutions to provide street 
cameras that take mug shots of protestors and then compare 
them with the Government database using face recognition 
softwares. It was widely used during the Beijing Olympics. 

Democracy, anyone? There are many who dismiss these security 
concerns as elitist citing square meals as more important than 
privacy. But it is a proven point that a dictatorship often comes up 
with enviable economic numbers, great infrastructure. Even then 
do we want to go back to our Emergency days?

Now a few points on the development cover. That it is a complete 
façade is proven when Manmohan Singh says that the UID can be a
vehicle to reduce fiscal deficit. Though it is being said that it is 
entirely voluntary, Nilekani’s comments, “Sooner or later you will 
have to get your UID number” gives it away. Thus the ones without 
this number can be shunted out of any state social security 
schemes. Gradually public distribution system (PDS) can be 
eliminated giving way to food stamps by which you avail your 
quota of grains from groceries using stamps. This despite the 
abysmal record of food stamps in other countries including our 
neighbour Sri Lanka. This despite a universal scheme working 
better than a targeted one in a country with the highest number of 
malnourished children.

On the technical front, the UID will be based on finger prints 
that will be stored as images. In a country of billion people 
how full proof is that when even finger prints change with 
years of hard labour? The questions keep mounting without 
any cogent response from the Government. At this point all 
that can be said is even the cacophony of a rally is music to 
ears compared to what we are in for. 

To end with the 
beginning, I can only resort to Orwell’s dystopian ‘1984’:
“Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres 
inside your skull.”