In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

1170 - Sreelatha Menon: A CAG for the village - Source Business Standrd

Niyamat Ansari's murder for exposing pilferage of NREGA funds highlights the need for a rural audit system.
Sreelatha Menon / New Delhi March 6, 2011, 0:51 IST


The class monitor is never liked. Other children either uniformly hate or envy that person. So is the case with whistleblowers. But, while in a classroom, every child is a potential wrongdoer — the offence, though, could be as minor as talking in class — a whistleblower who exposes corruption by government or panchayat functionaries in schemes such as the national rural employment guarantee scheme or the public distribution system is disliked only by the wrongdoers while he is a hero and role model for the rest.

Niyamat Ansari is the latest citizen activist who has paid the price for knowing more than the rest of the villagers, thanks to his enterprising use of the Right to Information, and as founder of NREGA sahayta kendras in villages in Latehar district. He earned the backing of activists like Jean Dreze, who have thrown their weight behind Ansari’s investigations into corruption and malpractices in NREGA.
 
Ansari helped poor villagers get compensation for non-allocation of work under the scheme and only 10 days ago his complaints led to an FIR against the BDO in the area. Rs 2 lakh were found in the BDO’s house. Three days later, goons picked up Ansari, beat him up for an hour and left.

Villagers tried to take him to a hospital 10 km away but he could not be saved.

Two years ago, another activist in the Palamau district of Jharkhand, Lalit Mehta had met a similar end. He was also an associate of Dreze and was part of the social audits he had done in the district to expose corruption. In 2010, about 11 whistleblowers who used the RTI to expose or find potentially unsavoury truths for wrongdoers were killed.

Another whistleblower, Amarnath Pandey in Uttar Pradesh’s Sonebhadra district, barely escaped death last month after his inquiries had exposed wrongdoings. NAC member Aruna Roy has written to Congress president Sonia Gandhi, seeking quick action against Ansari’s killers and also to expedite the whistleblowers’ Bill to protect citizen activists.

She says the RTI has made every citizen a potential whistleblower and hence a potential victim.

The killing of Ansari could have been avoided if the burden of audit was not on individuals like him but on an institution that could be as trusted and credible as the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

The new model for social audits in villages, under government consideration specifically for the purpose of NREGA, is expected to promote a linkage with the state CAG office. The CAG has already recommended certain changes in the NREGA Act’s sections on social audit, which is now conducted by the Gram Sabha or the entire village. That almost never happens as the dominant classes and castes have the biggest say in any village.

So, the CAG recommended that the audit of NREGA accounts be carried out by either the director, local fund audit, or by CAs appointed by the state government from the list of CAs empanelled with the CAG. The CAG and state Accountant General would have the power to issue directions and instructions to the CAs or the director, local fund audit, regarding the conduct of audits.

That would produce a far better situation than a solitary citizen exposing himself to vicious wrongdoers.

In fact, when such a dispensation is set up through an amendment in NREGA, it should be extended to all village-level schemes through the creation of similar auditing systems at the village level so that no villager is denied their entitlements and more Niyamat Ansaris don’t have to lay down their lives to expose the theft of funds meant for the poor.