In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, October 7, 2013

4763 - Govt draws a watertight case for Aadhaar - Rediff


Rediff.com  » Business » Govt draws a watertight case for Aadhaar
Govt draws a watertight case for Aadhaar

October 02, 2013 13:46 IST

Surabhi Agarwal in New Delhi

Soon after the rap from the Supreme Court, the government has got into a fire-fighting mode to solve the crisis over the Unique Identity or Aadhaar project.
According to officials in the know, the government is preparing a water-tight case to justify the need for Aadhaar for availing some government services as it gears up to seek a review of the Supreme Court order.

The National Identific-ation Authority of India Bill, 2010, which will provide a legal backing to the Aadhaar initiative, is also likely to be taken before the Cabinet for discussion this week.

The Supreme Court had observed last week that enrolling in the project could not be made a condition to access government services or subsidies.


This has adversely impacted the ongoing direct benefits transfer initiative with user agencies such as the petroleum ministry seeking a legal view on how to carry on with a scheme that transfers cooking gas subsidy directly to the Aadhaar-linked bank accounts of beneficiaries.

The Bill, which was sent back by the Parliamentary Standing Committee headed by Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, will be cleared by the Cabinet first and is expected to be tabled during the winter session of Parliament.
In order to prepare its ground well before approaching the apex court, the government has also pulled out two significant Supreme Court orders, which have recommended the use of Aadhaar in the past for accessing government services such as the public distribution system.


“Other departments which have been using Aadhaar for subsidy payments under them are also being requested to provide data on how the linkage has helped them remove fakes and duplicates from the system,” said a government official who did not wish to be identified.
The person also said that since the Supreme Court highlighted the issue of enrolling illegal migrants, data is being readied to show that a miniscule 0.2 per cent of people are enrolled without any documents under the introducer system under the project.
In an order passed in September 2011 in the matter between People’s Union for Civil Liberties and Union of India, a committee under retired Justice D P Wadhwa had recommended the electronic authentication of delivery and payments under the PDS should be done through online Aadhaar to reform the system.

“States/UTs (Union territories) maybe encouraged to include the PDS-related KYR+ (know your residence) field in the date collection exercise being undertaken by various Registrars across the country as part of the UID (Aadhaar) enrolment,” it said.
In the second order dealing with the issue of bogus admissions in government schools, the court gave a direction to the Education Department of Kerala “to issue UID card to all the school children” to determine the number of actual students in the school.
Business Standard has reviewed copies of both these orders.
Last week on Monday, the Supreme Court had said in an order that “No person should suffer for not getting the Aadhaar card in spite of the fact that some authority had issued a circular making it mandatory and when any person applies to get the Aadhaar card voluntarily, it may be checked whether that person is entitled for it under the law and it should not be given to any illegal immigrant.”
The order has raised concerns about the way forward for the direct benefits transfer scheme. It is a bigger cause of worry for governments such as that of Delhi that are about to go to the polls soon and have mandated the use of Aadhaar for many government services such as marriage and property registration.
UIDAI has enrolled almost 500 million residents so far and has a target of giving the UID number to 600 million people by 2014.