AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 4880 - BJP's think tank presents scary data on Aadhaar roll out, Cong-led states account for over 50% coverage

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, October 26, 2013

4880 - BJP's think tank presents scary data on Aadhaar roll out, Cong-led states account for over 50% coverage - Economic Times

BJP's think tank presents scary data on Aadhaar roll out, Cong-led states account for over 50% coverage

Nistula Hebbar, ET Bureau Oct 23, 2013, 04.48AM IST

NEW DELHI: The UPA government's direct benefit transfer scheme is expected to yield it political dividends, just how and how much is a matter of some speculation. BJP's newly inaugurated think tank, the Public Policy Research Centre (PPRC), however, has done the necessary number crunching and come up with a set of slightly scary data for the party in the election year.

To provide a fit case for comparison, according to the research paper they came up with, UPA's politically super successful loan write off programme of 2009 was examined in detail.

"Almost 56% of total waived loans were in UP, Maharashtra and Andhra. Around Rs 30,000 crore were waived off to around 1.75 crore farmers. These three states send the highest number of MPs — 80, 48 and 42 (along with West Bengal), respectively.

Congress won 71 seats in these three states alone. A gain of 40%," said the paper. The inference is that targeted schemes were aimed at Congress-ruled states where they were rigorously implemented and political dividends gained.

The paper then goes on to look at the Aadhaar scheme roll out and its distribution and spread (2012 data). "40% of the 22 crore Aadhaar numbers are in Andhra Pradesh (4.7 crore) and Maharashtra (4 crore) where the Congress can expect major gains," the paper concludes.

These two states, the research states, account for 20% of the total districts selected for DBT. Congress-led states account for more than 50% coverage of total identified districts.

The states with lowest penetration of Aadhaar are West Bengal, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu. Age also plays a factor, 55% of numbers are in the "vote catchment friendly age group" of 16-45. Those above 66 years account only for 4.3% numbers issued.

Among the 121 districts identified for DBT, 62 districts are from Congress-ruled states, with only 17 from BJP-ruled states. While communal polarisation and caste are certainly election changing issues, the DBT is a worry for the party.

"Our attempt is not to be deliberately partisan, but certainly, we want to give pertinent and useful analysis to the party, and anyone else who wants it," says PPRC chief Vinay Sahasrabuddhe. He adds this is just a sample of the kind of work the think tank will do.

A RSS source said in the last few years, the lack of academic depth in terms of ideological articulation has worried the party.

In the last decade or so, RSS affiliated think tanks like India Policy Foundation and the Vivekananda Centre have been fairly active. Congress has its own set of institutions, including the Rajiv Gandhi Institute for contemporary studies, with Dr Mohan Gopal as chief.