AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 4777 - DBT scheme: People 'forced to pay extra' termed plan 'faulty'

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, October 7, 2013

4777 - DBT scheme: People 'forced to pay extra' termed plan 'faulty' - Hindustan Times

DBT scheme: People 'forced to pay extra' termed plan 'faulty'

Jatinder Kohli , Hindustan Times Jalandhar, October 06, 2013

First Published: 22:10 IST(6/10/2013) | Last Updated: 22:11 IST(6/10/2013)

Linking Aadhaar card with the bank account with an aim for direct transfer of the subsidies for Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) have proved costly for the consumers as they are forced to pay about `100 more for buying a subsidised cylinder as compared to earlier system.

Not only the consumers are paying extra, confusions regarding how much and when they would receive subsidy into their accounts are also troubling them.

Those who have already linked their bank accounts with Aadhaar numbers have also termed new system 'expensive'.

Gas agencies and nodal agency of DBT, that is, district food and supply department were also unaware about the fact that why consumers, who have linked their bank accounts with Aadhaar numbers are forced to pay Rs. 100 extra.

In Jalandhar, an LPG consumer Raj Kumar, who had linked his bank account with Aadhaar number, said he had paid Rs. 1066 for an LPG cylinder, but was shocked to find out that he had received only Rs. 435 into bank account as subsidy. He added that it was surprising that in this way, the cylinder cost Rs. 600 more whereas the consumers who have not linked their Aadhaar numbers are still getting subsidised cylinder at Rs. 430.

He said it would have been better had he not linked his accounts with Aadhaar number. He also blamed government for not giving a clear picture about DBTL scheme.

In Nawanshahr, an LPG consumer, Lachhman Das said he had paid Rs. 1000 despite amount printed as `Rs 993 on bill receipt of cylinder and was shocked to find out from statement of bank account that only Rs. 470 was received as subsidy from government.

"In this way, the cylinder costs around Rs. 523 and I was forced to pay Rs. 93 extra for it,"he alleged. He added that the central government and gas agencies had created DBT just to rob the common man and stated that old system was better than the 'faulty DBT scheme'.

Chief area manager, Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) Rajeev Patel said, "Those who have linked their accounts with Aadhaar will get Rs. 435 on the booking of cylinder into their account as 'advance' from government."

He added that Rs. 435 was not a subsidy amount and those consumers, who had got cylinder delivered, would also get subsidy amount into their accounts within a few days and people should not be worried.