In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, October 13, 2013

4812 - Debate on Aadhaar: Supreme Court should not make us rethink - Economic Times


Oct 9, 2013, 02.55AM IST
By Varad Pande

A recent Supreme Court interim order has reopened the debate on Aadhaar. We need to understand the implications of the order and reassess the "why" and "what" of Aadhaar. The order says that no service should be denied to a person who doesn't have Aadhaar. This is a fair observation.


Aadhaar has always intended to be an instrument of inclusion, not exclusion. The Unique Identification Authority of India, which manages the Aadhaar programme, has always maintained it is voluntary.

A government circular issued in December 2012 makes it clear that "no person should be denied service for want of Aadhaar..." Clear protocols are being put in place for "exception management", or ensuring that service is not denied to anyone. For example, for cooking gas subsidy, the Aadhaar-based payment has been initiated only in districts with over 80% enrolment. Focused enrolment campaigns are being undertaken and issuance of Aadhaar fast-tracked.
Permanent enrolment centres are being set up at the block level to provide ongoing enrolment. Second, the order says it should be checked whether a person is "eligible" for Aadhaar and that Aadhaar should not be given to illegal immigrants.

From the outset, Aadhaar has been a programme for all Indian residents. It does not go into the complex question of citizenship and does not confer any rights of citizenship. Nor does it entitle a resident to any benefits by itself, it is a mere proof of identity.

The prerequisites for enrolment into it have been deliberately kept at a minimum — a valid proof of identity and address. Those who don't have these can be introduced by another Aadhaar holder, subject to checks and balances.
For the poorest and the most marginalised, Aadhaar becomes the first step on the ladder of social and economic empowerment. This is also a good moment to reassess why India is undertaking the gigantic Aadhaar exercise. The first benefit is proof of identity. But the benefits go much further.

Aadhaar is now recognised as a valid know-your customer (KYC) to open a bank account and many other services. Aadhaar has launched an electronic KYC service that makes this process instantaneous. It will now be possible to open bank accounts instantly, at the doorstep, through biometric-enabled micro ATM machines handled by business correspondents, if one has an Aadhaar number.
This opens up access to a range of formal financial services for the poor. 

Aadhaar is the basis for the direct benefits transfer (DBT) programme that aims to transform public service delivery in India by providing payments to intended beneficiaries directly. This cuts out several layers of intermediaries who have been the bane of the delivery problem in India.

DBT-Aadhaar can be a true "win-win": by eliminating "duplicates" and "fakes", it ensures that the right person gets the benefits, and generates fiscal savings at the same time. Successful experiments in districts like East Godavari in Andhra Pradesh, with more than 95% enrolment, show that beneficiaries are much more satisfied with the new DBT-Aadhaar system and, at the same time, fiscal savings of up to 20% are being realised.