In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label Economic Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Economic Times. Show all posts

Thursday, December 20, 2018

13986 - Interesting Economic Times Articles on Aadhaar - Nov-Dec 2018


`Will restore aadhaar services to 3L common service centres: Prasad'  28 November 2018


`Aadhaar authentications, enrolments plunge in November after SC order' (3rd December)

`RBI mulls live video authentication' (December 10, 2018)

(From October 1, 2018)
`No question of deleting Aadhaar data: UIDAI CEO Ajay Bhushan Pande' (October 1, 2018) (ET)

`Govt seeks legal opinion on the validity of Aadhaar-based eSign services' (December 11, 2018)

`Linking of Aadhaar & Voter ID may be made mandatory' (December 13, 2018)

`eSigns latest victim of SC’s Aadhaar verdict, Financial services may take a hit' (December 14, 2018, p.9)

Thursday, November 14, 2013

4925 - Lack of transparency in implementation of Aadhar cards : Biman Bose - Economic Times


PTI Nov 4, 2013, 08.48PM IST


KOLKATA: Lack of transparency in the implementation of Aadhar card is affecting services to the common people, CPI-M state secretary Biman Bose said and accused UPA government at the Centre for it.

"This lack of clarity in issuing Aadhar cards should be removed as it is effecting the common masses. The lack of transparency is affecting the services to the masses," he rpt he told a press conference.

Bose said Aadhar cards to be linked with bank accounts will affect the masses as many poor people in villages do not have bank accounts to avail its facilities.

Asked to comment on West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's recent tirade against the Centre over Aadhar cards, Bose said "When this matter was brought up by the UPA regime, the Left had protested against many anomalies. But what was the stand of Trinamool Congress, which was then an ally of UPA, needs to be looked into."

"What was their (TMC) stand then and what is their stand now needs to be looked into," said Bose.

Banerjee had few days ago said Aadhaar cards must not be made compulsory to receive LPG gas subsidy and called for immediate review of the oil ministry's move.

Banerjee in her capacity as TMC chief had also warned that the IOC regional headquarters here might be gheraoed if required.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

4880 - BJP's think tank presents scary data on Aadhaar roll out, Cong-led states account for over 50% coverage - Economic Times


Nistula Hebbar, ET Bureau Oct 23, 2013, 04.48AM IST

NEW DELHI: The UPA government's direct benefit transfer scheme is expected to yield it political dividends, just how and how much is a matter of some speculation. BJP's newly inaugurated think tank, the Public Policy Research Centre (PPRC), however, has done the necessary number crunching and come up with a set of slightly scary data for the party in the election year.


To provide a fit case for comparison, according to the research paper they came up with, UPA's politically super successful loan write off programme of 2009 was examined in detail.

"Almost 56% of total waived loans were in UP, Maharashtra and Andhra. Around Rs 30,000 crore were waived off to around 1.75 crore farmers. These three states send the highest number of MPs — 80, 48 and 42 (along with West Bengal), respectively.

Congress won 71 seats in these three states alone. A gain of 40%," said the paper. The inference is that targeted schemes were aimed at Congress-ruled states where they were rigorously implemented and political dividends gained.

The paper then goes on to look at the Aadhaar scheme roll out and its distribution and spread (2012 data). "40% of the 22 crore Aadhaar numbers are in Andhra Pradesh (4.7 crore) and Maharashtra (4 crore) where the Congress can expect major gains," the paper concludes.

These two states, the research states, account for 20% of the total districts selected for DBT. Congress-led states account for more than 50% coverage of total identified districts.


The states with lowest penetration of Aadhaar are West Bengal, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu. Age also plays a factor, 55% of numbers are in the "vote catchment friendly age group" of 16-45. Those above 66 years account only for 4.3% numbers issued.

Among the 121 districts identified for DBT, 62 districts are from Congress-ruled states, with only 17 from BJP-ruled states. While communal polarisation and caste are certainly election changing issues, the DBT is a worry for the party.

"Our attempt is not to be deliberately partisan, but certainly, we want to give pertinent and useful analysis to the party, and anyone else who wants it," says PPRC chief Vinay Sahasrabuddhe. He adds this is just a sample of the kind of work the think tank will do.

A RSS source said in the last few years, the lack of academic depth in terms of ideological articulation has worried the party.

In the last decade or so, RSS affiliated think tanks like India Policy Foundation and the Vivekananda Centre have been fairly active. Congress has its own set of institutions, including the Rajiv Gandhi Institute for contemporary studies, with Dr Mohan Gopal as chief.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

4869 - UIDAI to generate 60 cr Aadhaar nos before schedule: Nandan Nilekani - Economic Times

PTI Oct 21, 2013, 09.25PM IST

(UIDAI Chairman Nandan Nilekani…)


NEW DELHI: UIDAI Chairman Nandan Nilekani today said the authority will beat the target of generating 60 crore Aadhaar numbers before schedule in next few months.

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) Chairman said 46 crore Aadhaar numbers have been given so far.

"By 2014 there was a target to generate 60 crore aadhar numbers. We will beat this before schedule in next few months. So far 46 crore aadhar numbers have been given. In September we added 2.5 crore Aadhaar numbers," Nilekani said while delivering Annual Eisenhower Day Lecture on India's Journey to 2018.

He said the government believes in inclusion and a large number of Indian's do not have q valid identification.

"We believe in inclusion.Fundamentally we need to shift to higher gear... We have huge demand from all across the society for Aadhaar numbers. We have to make sure that the delivery model is more equitable and efficient," he said.
Nilekani also said that there is a need to improve infrastructure to make tge delivery more fast and cheap.

"We need to change scale of everything and have to deepen access by improving infrastructure."


He said UIDAI is a tool that can help provide identity to a huge population that has no valid identity.

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

4846 - Aadhaar example of using technology to leapfrog: Nandan Nilekani - Economic Times

By PTI | 16 Oct, 2013, 09.35AM IST

"Aadhaar project is to solve the problem of people who do not have an acknowledgement of their existence by people and the state," Nilekani said.

MELBOURNE: Aadhaar project is an example of using modern technology to leapfrog for future development and transformation of a country, UIDAI chairman Nandan Nilekani has said. 

"Aadhaar project is one such example of using modern technology to leapfrog," Nilekani told a packed audience while giving an oration titled 'India's transformation: The role of Information Technology' here last night. 

"Aadhaar project is to solve the problem of people who do not have an acknowledgement of their existence by people and the state or lack of acknowledgement of their identity," he said. 

Nilekani, an IIT-ian who left Infosys to join the government as the head of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), stressed that by giving every Indian person a unique 12-digit number under the Aadhaar project could change their lives, and the nation. 

Nelikani said that in India which has the total population of over one billion, only 50 million people had passports which was mere five per cent of total population, around 30 million people paid taxes and over 150 million people had driver licence. 

"All these traditional IDs are only available to a very narrow segment of India's population," he said, adding that the need to create an ID system which can then provide an access to other host of public services and utilities was imperative in modern times. 

"Not having an identity today can be a huge impediment." "Government has set up this Aadhaar programme principally for two main reasons. One is to give everybody an ID so that they can participate in so called modern economy and second, is to see that its numerous welfare schemes which goes to individuals are being passed to the genuine beneficiaries." 

The project can be used to demonstrate that modern technology can be used for future development and transformation of a country 

With Aadhaar in place, the government could deliver entitlement and subsidies in much more efficient and equitable way, he said. 

"Aadhaar", or identification number, is merely a platform that can be utilised for other applications that many people are unable to access without formal identification, he said. 

Since the commencement of the project 30 million bank accounts have been opened as a direct benefit of the Aadhaar card, and 10 million transactions have been made using the unique ID number.


Sunday, October 13, 2013

4817 - Cabinet gives go-ahead to Aadhaar Bill - Economic Times

ET Bureau Oct 9, 2013, 05.38AM IST

NEW DELHI: Days after Supreme Court's ruling that said Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for availing government benefits, the Union Cabinet gave a go-ahead to the National Identification Authority of India Bill with minor amendments on Tuesday.

The Bill will now be placed before the Rajya Sabha for discussion during the winter session. Once approved by Parliament, the law will provide statutory status to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which functions under the Planning Commission.

UIDAI, which has been mandated to issue 12-digit Aadhaar numbers to 60 crore residents by 2014, currently operates through an executive order. The new law seeks to create a National Identification Authority of India, which will oversee implementation of the Aadhaar project. It also seeks to define penalties in case of misuse of data collected under the project.

According to a senior government official, who did not wish to be identified, the amended Bill addresses the issue of whether the UIDAI can enroll all residents or Indian nationals only, an issue raised by the Supreme Court.

"The Aadhaar number can be issued to any resident, including foreign nationals. It does not confers any rights regarding citizenship or domicile or any other right as per Section 6 of the Bill," the official explained. "Aadhaar establishes the identity of a person and not the nationality. It also serves as proof of residence. Moreover, it is a voluntary facility and not mandatory," the official clarified.

The Supreme Court in its interim order last month had said that Aadhaar number should not be given to illegal immigrants. The Bill was first approved by the Cabinet in 2010 and introduced in the Rajya Sabha in December that year. It was sent for scrutiny to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance headed by former finance minister and BJP leader Yashwant Sinha.

The committee had raised concerns about the policy, concept and expenditure of the authority. As on September 30, the UIDAI had incurred an expenditure of Rs 3,490 crore. However, the entire project cost was envisaged at Rs 12,398 crore. The authority has already enrolled around 44 crore residents across 18 states where it operates.

It has been mandated to enroll and collect biometric data of 60 crore residents across 18 states, while data of the remaining 61 crore population would be collected under the National Population Register programme. The 12-digitnumber for the entire 121 crore population will be generated by the UIDAI.

UID against rural poor?
RTI activist Aruna Roy has told the Supreme Court that the Unique Identification being assigned to every citizen is loaded against the rural poor. The cash payments being planned depend on a banking network in every remote part of the country, said Roy, in a petition filed along with other activists on Monday.


The dependence on machines, need for high-quality internet connectivity and vital role played by unaccountable private operators makes the system a potential nightmare for the intended beneficiaries," the petition said.

4812 - Debate on Aadhaar: Supreme Court should not make us rethink - Economic Times


Oct 9, 2013, 02.55AM IST
By Varad Pande

A recent Supreme Court interim order has reopened the debate on Aadhaar. We need to understand the implications of the order and reassess the "why" and "what" of Aadhaar. The order says that no service should be denied to a person who doesn't have Aadhaar. This is a fair observation.


Aadhaar has always intended to be an instrument of inclusion, not exclusion. The Unique Identification Authority of India, which manages the Aadhaar programme, has always maintained it is voluntary.

A government circular issued in December 2012 makes it clear that "no person should be denied service for want of Aadhaar..." Clear protocols are being put in place for "exception management", or ensuring that service is not denied to anyone. For example, for cooking gas subsidy, the Aadhaar-based payment has been initiated only in districts with over 80% enrolment. Focused enrolment campaigns are being undertaken and issuance of Aadhaar fast-tracked.
Permanent enrolment centres are being set up at the block level to provide ongoing enrolment. Second, the order says it should be checked whether a person is "eligible" for Aadhaar and that Aadhaar should not be given to illegal immigrants.

From the outset, Aadhaar has been a programme for all Indian residents. It does not go into the complex question of citizenship and does not confer any rights of citizenship. Nor does it entitle a resident to any benefits by itself, it is a mere proof of identity.

The prerequisites for enrolment into it have been deliberately kept at a minimum — a valid proof of identity and address. Those who don't have these can be introduced by another Aadhaar holder, subject to checks and balances.
For the poorest and the most marginalised, Aadhaar becomes the first step on the ladder of social and economic empowerment. This is also a good moment to reassess why India is undertaking the gigantic Aadhaar exercise. The first benefit is proof of identity. But the benefits go much further.

Aadhaar is now recognised as a valid know-your customer (KYC) to open a bank account and many other services. Aadhaar has launched an electronic KYC service that makes this process instantaneous. It will now be possible to open bank accounts instantly, at the doorstep, through biometric-enabled micro ATM machines handled by business correspondents, if one has an Aadhaar number.
This opens up access to a range of formal financial services for the poor. 

Aadhaar is the basis for the direct benefits transfer (DBT) programme that aims to transform public service delivery in India by providing payments to intended beneficiaries directly. This cuts out several layers of intermediaries who have been the bane of the delivery problem in India.

DBT-Aadhaar can be a true "win-win": by eliminating "duplicates" and "fakes", it ensures that the right person gets the benefits, and generates fiscal savings at the same time. Successful experiments in districts like East Godavari in Andhra Pradesh, with more than 95% enrolment, show that beneficiaries are much more satisfied with the new DBT-Aadhaar system and, at the same time, fiscal savings of up to 20% are being realised.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

4677 - The court gets it wrong on Aadhaar - Economic Times

ET Bureau Sep 25, 2013, 05.23AM IST

The Supreme Court's interim order on Aadhaar is unfortunate and should be remedied in the final verdict. True, the government should not deny benefits to deserving citizens just because they have not been able to obtain their unique identity number due to deficient supply arrangements.


But to go beyond this and obstruct use of Aadhaar to streamline disbursal of benefits would be miscarriage of justice manifold. To begin with, apart from the constitutional validity of issuing unique identity numbers, everything in the Aadhaar project is a matter of policy, altogether outside the remit of the judiciary, as per the clarification of the Supreme Court in response to the President's reference in the wake of the 2G verdict. It is time high courts and smaller benches of the Supreme Court stopped their routine trespass into the rightful domains of the executive and the legislature.

Second, to oppose use of Aadhaar to streamline disbursal of benefits is to collude in the corruption and leakage that attend such transfers. High-minded individuals raise assorted objections, only to be cheered on by middlemen who fatten themselves on leakages from public finances. Aadhaar is a project that will empower hundreds of millions of subaltern Indians to acquire proof of identity and access the formal financial system while producing great saving and efficiency in public finances. It would be grave iniquity to thwart all this on the basis of objections from privacy champions, whose possessiveness over their fingerprints evaporates when they stand in queue to supply the selfsame imprints to obtain a US visa. Aadhaar is voluntary, in the sense in which acquiring a ration card is voluntary.

But getting a ration card is mandatory for getting subsidised food. Such constraints are inevitable. The court's concern over illegal immigrants getting Aadhaar cards is understandable but misplaced. Being able to identify all residents is the first step to determining citizenship in this country where less than 5% of the population have passports, and birth certificates became commonplace only after 1989.

4676 - Bill in winter session to give legal status to Aadhaar: Government - Economic Times


PTI Sep 24, 2013, 05.10PM IST

NEW DELHI: The government will push for passage of a long-pending bill to provide statutory status to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) in the winter session of Parliament.

"We will bring the National Identification Authority of India Bill 2010 in Parliament during the forthcoming winter session for discussion and passage," Planning Minister Rajeev Shukla told PTI.

The UIDAI, which issues 12-digit Aadhaar numbers to residents, currently operates through an executive order.

The working of the UIDAI has come under scrutiny of the Supreme Court, which in an interim order yesterday, observed that Aadhaar can be issued only to Indian nationals and the identification number cannot be made mandatory for availing of benefits of the government's subsidy schemes.

The bill to provide the authority legal backing was approved by the Union Cabinet in September 2010 and introduced in the Rajya Sabha in December that year. It was sent for scrutiny to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance headed by former finance minister and BJP leader Yashwant Sinha.
"Now the bill has been sent back to the Planning Commission by the Standing Committee with some amendments. We will soon take it to the Cabinet and try to push the draft for passage in the winter session," Shukla said.

The minister said the UIDAI has not made enrolment for Aadhaar number mandatory for residents and it was for the central departments, ministries and state governments to decide how to verify the identity of beneficiaries.
"Aadhaar establishes the identity of a person and not the nationality. It also serves as proof of residence. Moreover, it is a voluntary facility and not mandatory," he said.

According to an affidavit submitted by the Planning Commission in the Supreme Court, "Aadhaar is issued to residents on voluntary basis. The consent of the individual is sine qua non before issuing Aadhaar numbers...it cannot be said that collection of biometrics information of the subjects who volunteer to same amounts to breach of fundamental right."

The UIDAI, constituted in January 2009, functions as an executive body under the Planning Commission.

The authority has been mandated to enrol and collect biometric data of 60 crore residents across 18 states, while data of the remaining 61 crore population would be collected under the National Population Register (NPR) programme.
The 12-digit unique identification number for the entire 121 crore population will be generated by the UIDAI.

NPR and UIDAI will share the data collected so that multipurpose national identity cards with Aadhaar numbers printed on them can be issued to all residents in the country.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

2073 - Objections to UID- Slide show- Economic Times



The former finance minister and senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha-headed standing committee on finance has picked multiple holes in the much-hyped Unique Identification 'Aadhar' Scheme and asked the government to bring forth a fresh legislation before Parliament. The key objections of the committee on the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010 include the following

1 - No feasibility study


 No comprehensive feasibility study - including cost-benefit analysis, comparative costs of aadhar number before approving such an expensive scheme vis-??vis various forms of existing identity such as hologram-enabled ration card to eliminate fake and duplicate beneficiaries - carried out. 

2 - Approved in haste


Absence of data protection law would make it difficult to deal with issues such as access and misuse of personal information, surveillance, profiling, linking and matching of data bases and securing confidentiality information.

3 - Security gaps


Entrusting the responsibility of verification of information of individuals to the registrars to ensure that only genuine residents get enrolled into the system may have far-reaching consequences for national security. The panel not sure as to whether complete verification of information of all aadhaar number holders is practically feasible and whether it would deliver the intended results without compromising national security.

4 - Directionless


The UID scheme has been conceptualised with no clarity of purpose and is being implemented in a directionless way and may end up being dependent on private agencies. 


5 - Unreliable technology




The scheme is full of uncertainty in technology as the complex scheme is built on untested, unreliable technology and several assumptions. Despite adverse observations by the UIDAI's biometrics standards committee on error rates of biometrics, the UIDAI is collecting biometrics information



6 - Limited coverage
It is not clear that the UID Scheme would continue beyond the coverage of 200 million of the total population. The exercise could become futile in case the government does not give further mandate.

7 - Lack of coordination


 Serious differences of opinion within the government on the UID Scheme. The Department of Expenditure, ministry of finance, has expressed concern that lack of coordination among at least six agencies collecting information --National Population Registry, MNREGS, BPL Census, UIDAI, RSBY - is leading to duplication of efforts and expenditure. 

The Home Ministry has raised serious security concern over involvement of private agencies in large scale scheme. The Ministry of Planning has expressed reservation over the merits and functioning of the UIDAI and the necessity of collection of iris image. The National Informatics Centre has pointed out that issues relating to privacy and security of UID data could be better handled by storing in a government data centre.