In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, October 13, 2013

4798 - Oil marketing companies want to use Aadhaar cards for LPG supply - Economic Times


Samanwaya Rautray, ET Bureau Oct 9, 2013, 05.44AM IST

NEW DELHI: State-owned oil marketing companies Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited have urged the Supreme Court to allow them to use Aadhaar cards to restrict LPG subsidies to those entitled to it on the grounds that they are facing "severe under-recoveries".
The companies on Monday claimed that the court's order directing them to stop using the Aadhaar cards to plug subsidy leaks would immediately bring to a halt the direct cash transfer scheme being introduced across 97 districts in the country.
Under the scheme, all LPG consumers need to buy cylinders at the market price and those entitled to subsidy will get the amount credited to their Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. The three companies claimed that this will reduce the extent to which domestic LPG is diverted to commercial use and plug substantial leaks in the subsidies, which amounted to Rs 39,558 crore in 2012-13, Rs 29,997 crore in 2011-12 and Rs 21,772 crore in 2010-11.
"The September 23 order has seriously prejudiced the effective and efficient implementation of Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG Scheme (DBTL). The order has created serious doubts and confusion and uncertainty in the minds of several crores of residents who have already enrolled for Aadhaar," the companies said in their plea filed through Meharia and Company.
The uncertainty will force them to revert to the old system in the 54 districts where the scheme has already been implemented, the companies claimed, adding that continuing both schemes would lead to extreme confusion, cost overruns and wastage of resources.
The companies urged the court to clarify its order that no consumer would be denied domestic LPG cylinders at market rates, whether or not the consumer held an Aadhaar card, but if a consumer wanted to avail benefit of subsidy, he or she should hold an Aadhaar card.
In its September 23 order, the court had said, "...no person should suffer for not getting the Aadhaar card in spite of the fact that some authority had issued a circular making it mandatory and when any person applies to get the Aadhaar card voluntarily, it may be checked whether that person is entitled for it under the law and it should not be given to any illegal immigrant."
The companies said the decision to phase out subsidies was taken after an expert committee recommended it. They also claimed that the sale of domestic LPG in 20 districts had gone down by 7.73 lakh cylinders from June to August, compared with the year-ago period, after the implementation of the scheme.
The sale of commercial LPG has gone up by 0.97 lakh cylinders during this period, the companies said. About 45,000 multiple connections have been detected and Rs 24 crore can be saved once these are blocked, the companies told the court.
Supreme Court to hear government plea after October 16
The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to modify for now its September 23, 2013 order asking the government not to make Aadhaar cards mandatory for availing any subsidies, brushing aside a warning that the order would bring the newly-introduced cash subsidy for LPG consumers to a grinding halt.
A bench, comprising Justices BS Chauhan and SA Bobde, said that it would hear the government plea to allow it to use Aadhaar cards to give LPG subsidies after the court's Dussehra break (from October 9 to 16). The top court brushed aside suggestions by Attorney General GE Vahanvati that the order would create "problems for thousands of people".

"The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas distributes LPG cylinders at highly subsidised rates. Aadhar is a full-proof method of preventing misuse of these subsidies as it cannot be duplicated. A voter I-card or ration can be duplicated," Vahanvati said. "People may not get subsidised cylinders. If we go back to the old system, distribution may come to a grinding halt," he warned.
He tried to point out that the issue may be placed before the Cabinet, only to have the bench take a dig at him saying: "You also have the Ordinance route." The judges said insisting that Aadhaar cards would be a condition of supply was a "double-edged weapon". "Essential supplies can't be deprived," Justice Bobde said.
Oil marketing companies also raised objections to the order saying it would worsen their financial plight, but the court said it would hear the issue at length after the break.